Canadian Sub-tree for USA

u made me freaking double check my sentence on the standalone

nup, just mix your line ups from which ever countries.
german vehicles can only still research german vehicles, russian russians and so on.
But you can use german leopards, russian CAS/heli and italian lights as example

It stops all the stupid br gap stuff or missing features and leaves nations to recreate their line ups, while rewarding veterans that play more then 1 tree.

wanna play canada? research germany and uk for your top tier line up.

Germany, italy and sweden complain about no irccm heli? use the heli of another nation.
You have a bad short range spaa? use another nations. pantsir domination as example , just use pantsir.
Everyone gets KH38 and so on.
Gajin can concentrate on the truely unique stuff as well

1 Like

Haha, sorry about that :)

Still no

As usual, an American main not making any research about it

2 Likes

Your arguments are entirely useless, instead of targeting the logic behind my point you target me. That’s not very efficient and shows a lot of immaturity from you, but hey benefit of the doubt says you never learned how to have a civil debate without personal opinions leaving your mouth.

I can use the same as you “US tree is only Sherman’s and Abrams, it’s copy and paste , there the same in China tree”

1 Like

I can agree with you, china should have never gotten the Abrams or the apachee, shermans all though have been so wide spread atp it doesnt matter anymore.







As for “america main” i dont really main a nation i kinda just play them all, if you want 110% honesty ive played more italy air in the past month than any ground because i want a EF.

Then…why you try to erase our ideas for a tree we don’t even want to be in?

Because, ive played alot of trees, unfortunately ive played ALOT of T72s and Leopard 2A4s THAT ARE IDENTICAL. The LAV series should not be the next sherman along with the leopard, but unfortunately the leopard is already getting that treatment.

My biggest thing is the Canadian air would be HEAVLY American with the f18 and other aircraft, same with the lav series mostly produced and was a joined project for most of the technology with GD. Id much rather see America with 30 different light tanks than the uk get more. The US needs more wheeled bois than the uk with their 100 different south african variants.

Before saying this, did you look the tree idea?

assuming you mean this specific thread yep… im the one who made it
image

The stars are copy and past

Without C&P
112
C&P percentage
19%

1 Like

And for the US problem, the Strykers and LAVS 25 should be perfect for this

The Canada build a lot of LAV but we don’t use all of them

1 Like

A whole lot of leopards here, i will say MEXAS 1 would be unique but besides that other nations have very similar if not identical vics.

Well yes…that what Canada use today

I agree

There around 800 people that want like me that Canada is added as its own tree and I will continue to fight for maybe one day see it…

1 Like

The only thing with the LAV is that its a corporate nightmare, mowag technically made the first “lav” but now GD made the LAV1, which Canada bought. GD then took the LAV 1 and upgraded the thing from the ground up with all new parts. The only reason its not “American” is because the US didnt buy it at first and second they outsourced production. So the argument of who made the LAV can go to anyone, technically the swiss, technically GD, technically put together in Canada.

1 Like

3 posts were made to not give china an abrams and every single one was shot down. Most had 60-70% against it but here we are.

Sadly I think there more Chinese who wanted the vehicle than angry Americans saying no