Canadian Ground Forces Tech Tree

It is done when it is done. ;)

bru

but also fair

when is what done? err- what are you asking about?

Yeah I was about to ask what do you mean?

i mean like when it is ready to use

the canadian tech tree

In War Thunder? Who knows could be next update could be 5 years.

lets not let it be that long

1 Like

Nobody other than specific Gaijin employees know what is coming in the future.
For all we know Canada won’t even receive vehicles in the future anymore or they could go independently very soon.

We just don’t know.
What you see here is just a presentation made by the community in order to highlight possibilities for the game, none of what you see here is guaranteed to come to the game.

3 Likes

but i love canada

I am a supporter of the Canadian tree too, but again: this is a community made project. It is only a presentation made by players of the game. It is unofficial.
It is not made by the developers of the game.

I am not saying this to make you dislike the concept nor am I saying this to evoke any negative feelings.
Rather, I am explaining that this isn’t guaranteed to come in the future. The best we can do is continue to support it, but in the end it won’t be anyone on this forum who gets to decide whether Canada gets an independent tree or not.

It’s much the same case for many other countries.
Personally I am a huge fan of the idea of a Yugoslav tree. I even made a ground tech tree proposal much like this one. Yet despite that, that does not mean that Yugoslavia will be a tree in the future: I am not the person who can decide that.

But again, the best I can do is continue to support what I believe would be good to see in game.
I encourage you to keep supporting what you want to see, including this tree.
It’s the least that can be done as a player.

4 Likes

ok

Thatz I had someone point out the info here is wrong as it has the wrong units:
Here is what I did to fix it:

Armour 4-14mm
1x .50 inch (12.7 mm) Vickers machine gun
1x .303 inch (7.7 mm) Vickers machine gun
Crew: 3
Max speed: 56 km/h (edited)

I don’t know if errors like this are elsewhere as I haven’t checked.

1 Like

This is a great idea, just one thing. The Leopard C2A1 MEXAS is already an event vehicle, it would have to stay as one.

Isreail got most of it’s event vechlies as TT.

So it’ll get the C2 Mexas as well. even more so as it is a key MBT for the TT and can’t be left out.

(Also C2A1 is a fake name Gaijin made up)

Oh oops i but inch instead of mm, ill correct that when I get home. I may also re edit the list so its easier to navigate slowly but it might be some trail and error

1 Like

Also it’s possible that the staghound mkIII was not used by Canada.

1 Like

Another vehicle I forgot to mention was that Canada was the first country to create a Prototype Achilles. When the project was decided that the 3 " Ram SP be cancelled. The Director of Royal Artillery (UK) approached the Canadian Headquarters in England and requested personally if Canada would be able to work on a re-design of the 3" M10 to mount a 17pdr since the British Directorate of Tank Design refused to work the project. Canada was able to produce a prove of concept and that lead to the UK to allow the starting of the Achilles program in UK. (I will find more information once I get around to suggesting this vehicle in a stand-alone suggestion)

7 Likes

I have two things to bring up.


First the Valentines.
On the tree, you have an Mk III but most of the source I found says the Canadian-built variants were the VI, VII and VIIA. Plus it seems the only Valentines Canada used was a few of the models they built themselves for training.
Unless this comes from the fact that the Valentine was known as “Tank, Infantry Mark III”


Second the Centurion.

I’ve had it pointed out that Canada apparently used the Centurion Mk 5/2 with the up guned “Royal Ordnance L7 105 mm” over the normal Mk 5(I think. They could have used both).

1 Like