I support this so other nation mains can finally stop arguing about Canadian vehicles
4 Likes
You forgot the ADATS, also its difficult because during WWII a lot of the vehicles used were made by a different country that was part of the allies. There wasn’t much domestic work made however there field mods that Canada did that could spice up 1 or 2 of those vehicles but the majority of them were used as they were manufactured since they did the job.
1 Like
I forgot to mention I didn’t mark the Canadian ones. I did originally but decided not to after.
As much as people complain about C&P, there is a lot of it in game already and they are adding the same SPH to as many nations as they can in this upcoming update.
I was going to suggest maybe some reshuffling to the area but I looked at the whole rank and it didn’t seem possible.
Yes, this tree has enough vehicles and a rich repertoire. Some people make a fuss about C&P, but its depth, potential, and relationships make Canada a worthy addition to the game.
At least that’s what I think.
2 Likes
Canada can definitely act as a tree.
I have nothing to say about C&P. I think you can add it.
1 Like
i want to see the Canadian vihicles, but im not sure grind so much C&P’s pain can be fixed by the fun in Canadian unique vihicles
Yeah I can see your point, this is again just a basic idea of a tech tree, I included a lot of vehicles people would include as Copy and Paste because I believed more in including all the vehicles that lead up to and/or are currently used by Canada today (including a few additions that do not apply to that).
I wanted to prioritized including them for historical purposes rather then leaving them out for the sake of making everything unique.
I could also look around for modifications and/or check if any special tests were done on any of the vehicles to make them unique but I’m currently working on other suggestions so I’ll post anything if I stumble on anything while researching for those other suggestions.
2 Likes
Thatz, I’m going to need you to explain how this qualifies suggestion and why.
Because to others, this isn’t a valid suggestion(non-mods). and I’d like to know what makes it valid.
Some one doesn’t like Canada
1 Like
They apparently don’t like the Dominion in general and think their current state(put wherever) is best for them.
I’ll tell ya one thing it not a good thing for them to be in this state.
Not here elsewhere. In other threads, they tell me it’s not a valid suggestion.
Luckily most of the people who do look here think it is valid.
2 Likes
This is 100% a valid suggestion, I’m not sure what people are saying really, but people have the right to agree or disagree with the suggestion and that is there choice.
Most people just see a few vehicles that are already in game and then say it’s invalid which is incorrect, if they look into the vehicles or look at the suggestions as a whole then I’m sure they would get a better understanding, or even if they asked questions I would be able to hopefully answer for them.
6 Likes
Ohhh you meant rules wise.
I thought you meant that nobody wanted such a tree. My bad!
1 Like
I’m sure those armchair moderators are right, and this isn’t a valid suggestion, which is why we haven’t removed it yet. /s
Staff don’t get any special treatment when it comes to their suggestions. The one here is fine.
1 Like
I was going to ask if the staff needed another mod to approve their suggestions and this just told me they do.
Thanks.
1 Like
Would be better as sub tree for USA, and give USSR an ukranian sub tree for balance
1 Like
I don’t think either of those nations needs a subtree.
7 Likes
Give everyone sub tree, Austria for Germans, India for UK, South Korea for Japan, ROC for China, Belgium for France (Italy just got one so they don’t get any) (dutch for Germany also works) sweden get norway, or ignore cause they already have finland
1 Like
USA, Germany, USSR, France and even China by no means need a sub-tree and it is ridiculous that UK received one.
1 Like