Are these arcade BRs? Because I’m assuming that the suggestion isn’t for 12.0 F-18s with AIM-9M, and 12.7 with AIM-120. Plus a number of other BR issues.
RB, tho many of them are old(a number of BR changes/additions have happened since starting to make it)
Case in point, the F-18 comes from before it was added, and all we had were guesses.
I probably should update the BRs with things now added. But if you have any recommendations, I’d love to hear them.
The next update is waiting on some suggestions that I have pending(and have a few changes with those), but if it’s something I don’t have planned, I can include it.
Alright that makes sense then
Both israel and sweden have a bigger indiginous weapons industry.
Canadas is just to small in modern age.
Modern age is what matters and canada has what their LAVs? Thats it on original stuff realy.
Israel has merkavas etc. Indiginous missle programs. Sweden has gripen, cv series and co.
Thats way more then canada
1 Like
Israelis also modify almost all of their jets domestically
1 Like
Yes, but beyond being modified they do have their specialised armaments.
Canadian and australian jets are modified imports, but they dont get unique armament either, all that is imported as well. They use the same Aim 9x, australia was a bit more intresting with asraam i think it was. But you can find that stuff on a lot other aircraft as well.
Israel does have way more to bring
1 Like
Yeah, almost all of the few differences are made/designed in the US for the hornets
like what was the differences? better radar and engine? sorry but thats not unique enough for me.
Even more since US has their own upgrades versions as well
Not even, it’s a light and a different landing computer stuff (carrier landing stuff not there) for the CF-18, and afaik the Australian one is just an F/A-18A that has ASRAAM
smh go learn some History bud…
Canada should be added in for Historical reasons not for how many Tanks we made Although we helped out a lot during WW2.
We modify our stuff M3 to Ram CF104 Nuke Carrier The 2A4M CAN C2A1 i CAN continue.
2 Likes
has Canada ever employed any Chieftains?
Literaly doesnt matter, the fewest people are history nerds and play the game for the low tier stuff.
The people join the game for the newest fanciest top tier toys which get shown of in the trailers and so on.
Top tier is where the money is, the rest is part of the way. If the top tier cant earn gajin money, it wont be added. It is as easy as that
Nice example of you to name a german leopard whose modification was designed and build by germany kmw as well lol, so much to you recommending to learn history.
The other stuff you named is to old and becomes irrelevant in the intrest of the common playerbase.
Modern canada is boring, it has nothing unique besides the LAV
true…
sadly
i mean one day all nations will be in the game, relevant or not, one day…
jup, look at belgium, netherlands, india. All claimed by their nations fans to be valid stand alone trees.
Or at least unions in the case of belgium, netherlands. But all stated by gajin to not be valid.
How i canada any better then those other nations? They all share the same thing, mostly boring top tier.
Only fitting to support existing trees. Belgium and netherlands have as much history as canada as well
Chieftains? There is a plane with that name? Because I have no idea why you’d ask that in the air thread rather then the ground one
If you’re talking tanks, then no, we used Cents until we had to get a new MBT. but that’s a convo for the ground thread.
The mentality of “only top tier matters” is boring as all hell and most definitely not the majority of players. Canada deserves a tech tree for its overall contribution and historical relevancy.
4 Likes
its the goal of many players and the main reason most join.
Might they along the way learn to love the more funkier stuff at lower brs? Definitly, but it isnt what gets the attraction.
Look at the playerbase, at every corner they complain about another merkava, magach, T-80. Leopard and so on being added. Same for Air, they are exhausted and dont want to grind trough the same crap the X time. Canada has historical relevance. But the playerbase is annoysed to hell about “copy pastes” of another sherman modification and so on. It needs to be hugely different to the base version, both playwise and visualy for the playerbase not to get bored or annoyed.
Example being the 2a4M can being relatively unique. Those factors canada just realy cant provide.
In Air it goes from ugh another UK tree to another US tree. Modified yes, but not enough
In my experience, the loud people that yap the most, in society in general, do not represent the majority of opinions.
3 Likes
oh shit mb
2 Likes
and yet they are what gajin needs to base their opinion on if the others dont speak at all.
Its the hardcore canadian fans supporting standalones mostly or the integration into the UK.
But like already stated gajin already showed they path how they wanna handle it with india, netherlands and belgium. Those nations like canada are not unique enough.
You are invited to explain how australia and or canada is better then those countries and deserve being entitled.
As a subtree UK is full. Arguments could be done for Canada to go to the US, but that would be a massive mistake as well and i have a feeling canadians wouldnt like that