Canadian Air Forces Tech-Tree

Well, now that I’m here I might as well bring up some of the planes I had to remove:

We couldn’t find photos of these two, so we had to remove them.

  • Hurricane Mk XII/Late

What I’d say is this was looking to be the best Hurricane variant, as this Canadian-built one has better engines, with the 4 20mm, despite a number of websites saying it existed we couldn’t find photos so it was removed.

  • Mosquito FB Mk 24

I don’t have much to say, just a Canadian-built mosquito with only two built so photos, we couldn’t find.


Honourable mentions:

Lancaster 10O

487008_10151278251063774_305229388_n
p_fm209a

A Lancaster equipped with the Orenda engines that were for the CF-100s. From what I found/heard it was lost in a fire.

CL-52

download
the-canadair-cl-52-which-was-a-b-47b-loaned-in-1956-to-the-v0-779nr4uw7pb91

A B-47 equipped with an Iroquois engine for the CF-105. It was given back to the US but had to be scrapped after no longer being air worthy after testing. Wither that was due to the power of the engine or how it was mounted I have no clue.

Both of these served as test beds for the engines and in turn were unarmed and not WT possible despite this being the only way Canada could have gotten a jet bomber without another nation(tho, out of the two the Lancaster, I find is more reasonable of the two.)

1 Like

annnnnnd germany if you include ground

Could say a similar thing about your Greco-Iberian suggestion.
After all these are suggestions and regardless of their implementation not everything can and will be added.

My Greco-Iberian tree is about 21% copy-paste, I even say so in the post. I intentionally tried to limit it wherever possible. Most of them are domestic upgrades that differ pretty substantially from their base counterparts, like the M48A5E3, or AMX-30EM2, and there’s still a decent number of wholly unique vehicles in there as well.

This Canadian tree, however, has far more copy-paste than that.

Not so sure of this as the different armaments and differences due to license production would by your definition not constitute as “direct copy paste”

If you can provide me numbers for how many vehicles suggested here actually have notable differences to vehicles in-game (or potential additions in-game in their home trees), and it’s actually a good majority of the vehicles, then I will change my mind. But from my knowledge and looking at the post, it’s not that high.

Again, I don’t want to be too negative, I think the work done here is impressive, I just really don’t think it’ll work as a standalone tree.

Indeed, no TT proposal is final, just an idea of how it could work. BRs, placements, and additions could all change and not be how it is here(or on any tree proposal).

This tree has more C&P because it was done on purpose.

I did say this was a “Blanket Tree”.
Ex. Added everything the nation could get, C&P or not. Even if it leads to many redundant additions. It’s meant to be dirty, just a “here is everything the nation could have”

Well you are describing an “Idealist Tree”
Ex. Limit C&P and try and add only unique, even if that means escalating the number of nations or other things. It’s meant to be pretty. a “here is an ideal way of doing it”

It’s Apples vs. Oranges, well similar they were done differently.


I will be frank, Canada air won’t ever be its strong point and this mostly exists to complement the ground tree(hence why it was done in the same way), as that is Canada’s strong point. If you want a strong air for Canada it needs another nation and I’ve said my thoughts on that(all it really needs is the ANZACs.)

I’ll be honest here. Both the air and ground trees are almost wholly British. Definitely either should be a British sub tree or a combined tree with ANZAC. At least option 2 stops the crying over what nation gets Canuk/Aussie vehicles.

2 Likes

Update #1

Fixed Sabre spelling in both post and photo
Fixed location of Vampire F.B. 5 specs.
Added updated link for CL-41R


Now that the updates are out of the way, onto two other things I remembered I couldn’t add…

CF-103

CF_103_Mockup

This plane was meant to be a super-sonic stopgap between the CF-100 and CF-105, but due to the fact, the CF-100 was able to go Mach 1 if you pushed it made it so this never happened and ended up being mock-up only. Personally, I think it looks really nice and wish it had happened.

Venga TG-10

image

This was meant to be a trainer(with an armed variant planned). Its only prototype would be destroyed in a fire before being flown.

2 Likes

How unfortunate.