Kiwis and Aussies will ALWAYS be together, anything less would be unacceptable. But yes, let’s get a CANZAC tech tree already!
4 Likes
Unless they can just create a new tech tree for Canada
2 Likes
Exactly it could be something like that for Canadian tech tree since they dont have alot, and to make the grinding balanced for the others, more research points for the vehicles since Canada doesnt have alot of Vehicles so yea.
I believe that Canada upgraded their CF-188 to make it more advanced than the Normal F-18C if im not mistaken which is good for Canada and could benifit for the Canadian mains in the future.
They should instead make a common wealth tech tree, with Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, South Africa, etc
This would solve many problems
It is widely debated which tree Canada, Australia, or Indian vehicles could go in, therefore, their all over the place
Canadian Leopard as a German Prem
Canadian ADATS in UK TT
Canadian WW2 Tanks in UK TT
Australian Abrams as US Squadron
Australian F-111 in UK TT
Indian Tank as UK Premium
then the big one
Indian MiG-21 as UK Premium
If there was one tech tree that all of these could go, that would be ideal, and would solve all these inconsistencies
1 Like
Canada would have enough stuff to become its own minor nation, could do something like done with Israel. What I see the most appropriate is the implementation of nation folders, something that would allow us to see many other nations properly added.
2 Likes
But it would be so copy and past
We would have very few unique options, the Grizzly would be a somewhat unique sherman, but still a sherman, and the Cf-105 Avro arrow, among few others
I like that idea, so we could see many more nations added, but again for Canada, India, Austrialia etc, where would they go? USA? UK? USSR? Germany? France?
I’ll just leave this here:
It’s true, however you could also include the M113 TUA, Leopard 1C (Leopard 1A4 with minor changes), Cougar, etc.
I’d say all Commonwealth nations should go under the UK, but India is special and we’d have to think through it. I’m unaware if they’ve got the potential to form their own TT.
1 Like
we dont talk about that
2 Likes
I tried to make a Canada in war thunder topic but it didn’t submit how did you get yours to?
2 Likes
Less Copy/Paste than China
1 Like
Still waiting Canadian tree, I would spend all my money for the premiums and get the full tree
but for now nothing new and I’m sad:(
1 Like
Because not too long ago, Sweden sucked. When I first played the game, Sweden’s top tier was the first Viggen, while America had the Phantom and Russia had the MiG 23.
Technically, Sweden still does suck, their only saving grace is the Grippen (which Italy, Japan, and Britain also get), a Leopard (which Italy, Germany, and France all get), and an Apache (which literally everyone but Russia gets). You can literally play Italy and get the same exact lineup (120mm cannon light tank, auto-cannon spike missile tank, Leopard, and Grippen). Or you can play France, which gives you the Leopard, ItO, and a better fighter and CAS jet.
shouldnt they not have this?
Has gaijin stated trial vehicles aren’t worthy to add?
I mean community feedback means nothing when its gaijins say so, more like they got it because there was nothing they could add.
1 Like
Tbf, Sweden has the T-80U which they never actually operated, the only had one for tank trials when they adopted the Leopard 2. I don’t think Gaijin is against trial vehicles, but I don’t think they like adding them often, and they’re usually in the form of prems, event, or squadron vehicles
I think the T80U was added because they figured people would spend GE to get it early to play with the MI-28, imo both should be replaced if possible. The T80 would be replaced with a Finnish Patria and the MI-28 has bothing that can replace it which is imo the only time trial vehicles should be accepted.
To go along with that, the Swedish T-80U doesn’t really have any lineups around it at 11.3 (though it does get downtiered to 10.7 quite often)
I don’t really think the T-80U is an issue, I personally like it but it also only has one round of each type, those being the earliest for the T-80U as well, and it has decently mediocre protection, but I wouldn’t mind if they unlisted it and replaced it with something Finnish as a replacement squadron vehicle
That and it’s also one of only two Swedish squadron vehicles, which other nations have less (Israel, France, and Italy) but I’d still prefer if they replaced it with another one
Then for helicopters the AHS and MI-28 are both trial vehicles because there isn’t really anything that can be added. The NH-60’s used by Norway and Sweden can use 4 hellfire but they dont have them in there arsenal as for the Swedes they are troop carriers and for Norway they are anti Sub.
We could get our Fennec’s from our Danish air unit with Tow missiles but it wouldn’t be equal to the MI-28 or AHS.