Gaijin changed the bomber damage models based on real life data of damaged and detroyed bombers in WW2. If you want other aircraft to recieve similar changes you should find similar data to support your case. Changes rarely get made just because someone asked for it, get som documents.
The su-25 is quite tanky already, the A-10 not so much
1 Like
that was 3 years ago, now its a flying sandwich.
It was nerfed, but still better than the a-10, still quite tanky by today’s standards.
1 Like
yeah thats what community always asked for but Gaijin on multiple ocassions just prefers to buff russian vehicles to make em look better but aight, people still will deny that.
1 Like
two of them are miserable ngl brother.
well, do they accept suggestion or bug reports regarding that primarily?
yea and it was stupidly tanky, i remember su25 regularly eating up to 4+ stingers and still turn around and nuke my LAV-AD with their rockets, not a good time. A10 on the other hand, light machine gun touching it will just kill the tail control, ridiculous.
1 Like
They are not good jets currently. But the su-25 damage model is still noticeably stronger than your average damage model
1 Like
Yeah, espicially when it come to adding vehicles to russia, I am not saying gaijin has preferences ( where i shouldn`t ), but an equalization for nations is required.
Flankers might be the strongest damage model currently, they are huge ass planes but still…
yea I also wanna point out that the A10, when critically damaged, generate SO MUCH drag on the airframe for some reason and u can barely fly even if ur engine are completely untouched, they are not very survivable at all
1 Like
I do think the frogfoot and a10 should be moved up already as they are really annoying for 10.3, they ought to be as tanky as reality shows but need to get moved up to a point where flareless subsonic fighters arent seeing them with all aspect and infinite countermeasures
yea the premium ones at 10.3 are so stupid. Especially the A10 “Early”, bro there was no such thing as early A10, all they did was copy and paste the 10.7 A10 and cut the aim9L carry limit in half so it can be 0.3 BR lower and farm on 9.3 flareless aircraft, purely cash grab
1 Like
it should have identical capability like the hawk t1a and hawk t1a FRP do. move them both to 11.0 and boost the durability a bit.
I dont think the 10.7 A10 should go up in BR, ur gona get mixed answers about this plane depending on who you ask, but personally I think it’s an “okay” plane for 10.7 ARB and “decent” for 10.7 GRB. I dont think buffing damage model for the A10 warrants it to go to 11.0 but the 10.3 premium one is definitely too low
Anybody asking for this was not around for su25 release or don’t care if su25 is broken again. We have went through this once already and it was found to be terrible for the game.
I personally think its absurd for the BR as it turns tighter than anything it fases and doesnt stall until they have already lawn darted. has all the countermeasures you can ever want and a gun that is a literal death star.
comparing it to peers of the BR its obscene
yes please. il-10 was made to survive autocannon fire yet a couple 50 cals turn it into lego pieces.
Lmao it doesn’t, it just goes slow, that’s it. Many aircraft turn way better than the a10 at that BR if they go the same speed. Further, it’s not a good jet in air RB as it goes 600kph and cant do anything if the other guy doesnt just head on you or turn with you
Pretty much every single fighter jet at the A-10’s BR is a better plane than the A-10, like what jets are you even thinking of here?
1 Like