You want to fight against T-54s in an Ikv72?
1 Like
I put that on the wrong post, However I appreciate the feedback. I do still disagree with largely most of the things you stated, you did bring up some good points. So, I’ll only touch on the ones I still disagree with.
Contrary to what you said in regard to 1v1’s is completely false. Because I only got better at dogfighting via 1v1’s.
I would go into further detail about the whole Ground RB base Idea; however, you seem to fear any sort of change within your mindset of “what the game is”. I wouldn’t want to ruin that.
Now in regard to the ERA lock in which you dread so very much. It could encourage players to coordinate with one another/ Squad mate in order to secure the win. With that being said, I don’t mind going up against an obviously superior vehicle while coordinating an attack with my friend('s) to kill a Tiger. However, in regard to you this may be difficult, because you would actually need to have friends. Unfortunately, I can’t imagine you’d make/ have any with the way you talk to people.
I do strongly believe you should be rewarded a little bit more for destroying a vehicle technologically superior to your own. It wouldn’t hurt anything in game, it could only add. Just because it’s been increased already does not mean it simply needs to not be increased anymore.
Having the wrong mindset on what War Thunder is, is subject to opinion. So, let’s discuss what it is. Now according to Gaijin themselves War thunder is a “free-to-play MMO military game dedicated to aviation, armored vehicles, and naval craft from World War II and the Cold War.” now does this mean they will never add more modern vehicles? Well clearly not, we have vehicles from the early 2000’s, and the Cold War ended in 1991. So, to make a comment that I have the “Wrong mindset of what the game is”, is disingenuous to my thread. If that be the case, I guess even Gaijin doesn’t know what War Thunder is. I appreciate your feedback, I’m glad I could antagonize another response from you with my “burger” ideas.
Good evening.
Having the wrong mindset is not a subject to opinion it is a fact. You are restating what has been stated for a very long time. I joined back in 2017 and those were the same arguments back then, which means that they have been an argument since ground battles were first introduced.
An argument that time after time after time has been repeatedly ignored and debunked due to the opposition ignoring the dumb statement cause that is what it is a dumb opinion.
Your logic implies that an F-86-F30 is capable of fighting the RAF Harrier GR3s or the Ha-Go Light tank is capable of fighting and defeating the Soviet IS-2 Heavy Tank. Cause they fought against one another.
Or that the L3/33 is capable of winning against the M4 Sherman Tank.
The logic is flawed in so many ways, and your excuse is “just use strategy”? I should not need to explain the cockeyed statements written into this and with that, I will no longer respond.
Twisting my words will not get you anywhere, now by my “logic” as stated in the original thread above. Each country would be limited to 2-3 Heavy tanks, and my “cockeyed” statements are my ideas. You don’t have to be here or respond since you have a phobia of Ideas lol. Unfortunately, you’re tripping over your own words.
^Now by saying this you are implying that your mindset is fact. Meaning that your definition (which is YOUR opinion) of mindset is “cockeyed”, and with that I deem you as an askew source of information pertaining to any and all topics in regard to anything and everything.
but hey man. what do I know, right? :)