Make sense, Chally 1 and 2 have basically the same performance (currently), 1 faces 10s and the other 11.7s only real difference is the shells, but the difference in BR mitigates that completely. But still Chally DS is historically a Mk3 and was exclusively deployed to Iraq with L26, Gaijin have confirmed this, but its being kept with L23A1 at 10.0. Giving L26 and moving to 10.3 wont change a thing as most run a 10.3 line up (Stormer and Jagaur are both 10.3) and probably run Chally Mk3 as back up tank anyway.
This is about fuel tanks absorbing all spalling but generates 0 spalling when the fuel tank itself gets penetrated. It is also the case for the thin, cylindrical armor protecting the autoloaders of Russian tanks. When your APFSDS penetrates, say, the front plate of a T-72, the spalling will be completely stopped by the fuel tank/autoloader armor. If your shell then penetrates the fuel tank/autoloader armor, it does not spall at all, so the only ways to kill that T-72 is either simultaneously kill 2 out of 3 crew members by the APFSDS alone, or a direct ammo rack (but ammo racks are not 100% guaranteed as we all know it).
3 Likes
It is called “Russian bias”.
2 Likes
Least obvious Russian main
1 Like
They have already been caught twice giving RU unfair advantage ( once armor ,once HE) ,if you count pen values of .50 cal straight out of Narnia …three times … not even going to mention Harry Potter level performance of ERA blocks
Who are we to suspect Gaijin of using magic again .
1 Like
ofc go cope harder “bias” my ass
In other words you have hit a fuel tank, which in game all fuel tanks can eat spall on any tank and blow up (not on each tank) in return, no matter how fair that would or wouldnt be.
Battle performance and test performance = two different things in this game.
1 Like
Yeah, if you play only against kids who bought their Abrams yesterday ofc it’s gonna be different.
Protection Analysis has been lying for years ,that is what i was referring to.
emmm it wasnt tested on protection analysis xD
This didnt have any protection analysis, only match settings.
This isnt the first time, K2 did the same thing months ago and got a result with NATO vehicles blowing up less than eastern vehicles (in case of blowout panel being compromised).
Test it in battle ,then tell us results
watch the video
I did ,side shots
Test it in battle
watch the second part of the video cuz i see you did not as it was front shots monkey
Monkey ,is that the level.O.K have it your own way.