No need to spread trialed stuff nonsense to other TTs, especially Big 3.
1 Like
We as in players that plays Soviet Union or as a community in general can instead push forward unique vehicles but with similarities in terms of gameplay, it is completely understandable that half of the community will support the copy and pasted thing as a way to justify no gate keeping of content for one nation and line-up diversity and the other that will justify that it’s pointless and it prevents uniqueness between nations.
Soviet Union don’t share the fire-and-forget weaponry installed in ground vehicles and as for Russia it is at the very early stages, as for any other post-Sovietic Republic it’s socially denied, apparently Soviet Union can’t have other minor nations represented (Soviet Union = Russian Federation), nonsense apart, I wouldn’t oppose however there are some others wheeled vehicles with autocannons (e.g. K-17) that could be considered, and if you really want, create a suggestion for it, see also Centauro I for USSR tech tree.
i wish spikes were actually top attack, i think theyre a bit better in this dev server but calling them top attack is still ambitious
no
its not a place to ask as its higly biased against adding to USSR. So as much as im against copypastes, seeing the SU-30 and BMP-3 given away, im all in for addition of all trialed wheelers to USSR. Only to justify all other trials
1 Like
First time i saw that i tought it was postet by TIGER_TANK_1
3 Likes
Do you like Centauro and Freccia? Want to play? Play the Italian TT. Other solutions like the one you suggest are just the shortest route to your dreams. Dude, that’s too easy.
1 Like
He also suggested Russian Algerian subtree for France lmao
hold you’re horses! sweden has a T80U AND a BMP2MD, Italy (they also have a BTR80A) and Germany have T72M1s, THE UK (and Germany) have the OSA and strela are they not NATO countries? so why can’t USSR have some NATO tech?
TIGER_ TANK_ 1 hit the rebirth button i see
Like one thing I dont get, why dont suggest domestic wheeled platforms for russia?
Or, you know, one of the nations that would actually make sense within russia?
Belarus, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Kazachstan - I dont think anyone would mind any of these nations/vehicles to appear in russian TT.
But no, its always modern western NATO tech being asked for.
Like, just quickly browsing through suggestion:
Kazachstan ARMA
Kazachstan Barys (TEMU Vilkas)
Kazachstan Tulpar
Belarusian Stalker
Belarusian Volat
and many more - you want to tell me these wouldnt do?
3 Likes
No
trialed by sweden, should be removed because trialed vehicles open can of worms.
Sweden has access to this one through finland, just as T55s and T72s; finlad is subtree of sweden.
Italy has access to these old vehicles through pre-fall of iron curtain hungary; hungary is subtree of italy.
Both OSA and T-72 and Stela (again, old vehicles) were used by NVA in the past, after unification of germany these were transfered to bundeswehr, which subsequently either took them out of service or sold them. same with e.german aviation.
UK has access to those through india; india is subtree of UK.
Why russia should have access to modern NATO tech?
because some of the NATO states were formerly members of warsaw pact?
So russia should get top of the line 2A8 Leopards because czech republic was member of warsaw pact more than 40 years ago?
Why not ask for modern vehicles from nations that are actually alligned with russia, as I showed in the comment above?
1 Like
Well that tends to happen when you export quite a bit of stuff
World is the Soviet Union.
That tends to happen when you export a bunch of stuff, but the people who you export to decide that maybe they wanna switch sides once you implode.
Also btw, USSR TT has 20 pieces of equipment(7 ground, 13 air.) This means that percentage wise, only germany, italy, sweden, and china have more soviet/russian equipment than the soviets have “western” equipment. So statistically the USSR is more filled with western equipment than most western TTs are filled with USSR equipment.
No. Bad idea.
Oh he’s the guy who thought 2A8 for USSR.
Yes