do have to say its making me die inside reading these old forum posts and seeing just how much worse everything is now than it was in 2025… this weapon OP? even tho its only carried by like 5 vehicles (spread across the nations)? clearly NEEDS a nerf into the grave to the point it can’t even kill XM246s (experienced this in my Jaguar just now). let alone Russian MBTs that it faces every game… like why even have a weapon you (the devs) claim needs to be nerfed to be balanced when they add shit like BMPTs to the game with fantasy performance.
1 Like
It’s cause they don’t care about any NATO weaponry, and won’t do anything to improve them.
1 Like
Oh but don’t worry, the BMPT they just added has the 2016 modification stock on it… so much fun using ammo from the 80s/90s to fight modern ERA on a top tier chassis. We’ve been asking for a LONG time now for anti-era generation APFSDS (for example, M829A3/A4, actually modeling anti-era for DM53 and L26A1, etc) but that “wouldn’t be fair”. Yet it’s somehow fair for Generation II/III APFSDS to be fighting ERA designed to counter Generation III/IV APFSDS. If I hadn’t spent so much money on this game and have things from my late wife (as she decorated some of my planes and tanks), I would have walked away from this game a while ago. Not to mention, we as the community have been BEGGING for more game modes and Gaijin responds with “Well, we think you’re too stupid to do that”.
2 Likes
Or they take, and this isn’t a hyperbole, WORD OF MOUTH to nerf NATO equipment. Ironic we have literal photos of missing armor in the M1’s breach and Gaijin goes “Oh well, we don’t know the material” as if they haven’t just assumed stuff for the Russians.
1 Like