Where was I rude? I’m literally using the most expensive paid ChatGPT service just to translate my language into yours clearly and properly, and somehow the AI is being rude to you?
My friend, I may not fully master English, but there was no offense at all during this conversation, just the assumption that you and I might be playing in different universes.
Because your point of view feels disconnected from what actually exists in the game, especially regarding the American weapons and their real efficiency and performance parameters, which I already mentioned above.
If you think the AI was rude to you, then I suggest you open **ChatGPT the most expensive version, obviously ** and ask it to formally apologize to you in public.
Then the way it is being translated makes it sound rude, it sounds sarcastic and condescending to me. It also looks like you’re trying to push assumptions on me, which I assume isn’t a translation error. You should not be using ChatGPT to translate, it is not a good translator.
Which is inherently rude and condescending.
Every missile and vehicle in game is worse than their real life counterparts. R-77s have insane drag and struggle to hit anything past 20km, PL-12s have significantly less range and pull, AAM-4s the same, etc.
pretty much all missiles I have played are pretty balanced.
The best fox2 is probably the aam3 for me, after this maybe magic2, aim9m or r73, depends on their usecase, since those fox2 do behave quite differently. after this maybe the aim9l/i and then the pl8b(they dint rlly work for me in the few games I have played them.
All of these nations are artificially nerfed in game honestly. Chinese missiles lack in their realistic range and pull, the R-77/-73 have a shorter range, AAM-4s have shorter range and worse pull, AAM-3s are IIR + have more pull + more speed + more range. Sweden has been the worst Air nation in game for its entire existence. The JAS39E is late, horribly modelled and they got the JAS39C after other nations. The JAS39A is artificially nerfed via its loadout and the JAS39C is missing most of its armament.
This does not mean the US doesn’t have problems, but the US is not exclusive to it.
AAM-3 and 9M are by far my favourite and the best, R-73s and PL-5EII only really work within 3km~ and I haven’t used Magic 2s. The PL-8B is essentially a Python 3 w/ IRCCM which means its in this weird inbetween where it works in medium range but its IRCCM works best in close range- but the missile itself doesn’t work well in close range.
pretty much every nation is nerfed in general, fox2 is pretty much a nobrainer, it maybe has some bugs but its not unplayable, since your footage was pretty much the missile shut its seeker off in a headon and didnt turn.
The fox3 is true since the aim120´s are not the best missiles ingame, but they are far off being useless. The aim120b´s are better than the c5 overall in most aspcets so I would just stick to them(I wont open the r77 drag topic here).
I think the last point was about sth with the f14, which idk about their missile performance since I didnt play them.
on the lower br site its pretty much a freekill when he doesnt preflare/flare it within the first second or two(noone rlly knows how to flare the there). I wouldnt bet on it since it was quite long ago when I played the 2000 but the magic2 was quite good.
I don’t know if you noticed, but the Su did a cobra at low speed, completely exposing the aircraft. The missile should’ve hit, but it didn’t because the missile is basically blind.
