With the US getting the F-111C from its own service anyway, what is the point of a 100% Copy paste Australian F-111C to the same TT?
Even now with the Australian Abrams, you never actually got the US M1A1 AIM anywhere, there was just no point add 2 of the exact same vehicle to 1 tree. The US is not exactly lacking in options for SQVs, Premiums or Event vehicles. With the amount they build they have something for a very long time.
Britain though is begining to run out of stuff at certain BRs. So filling those with more Commonwealth vehicles, like those in Australian or Canadian Service would be ideal.
Not too mention the fact that Canada and or Australia should have been out Sub-TT and not SA
Bro what like a solid 75% of Canadian military gear is just renamed and slightly modified, if at all American gear. And politics are a slippery slope on forums, shouldnt talk about it
Hahahahaha! That’s where you wrong. The only Yank stuff is our Jet Aircraft.
And even the only the F-18 wasn’t built in Canada.
Tanks, German. IFVs/APCs Canadian.
And before you say the LAV-III is American.
It came out in 1999
Well the US version the Stryker came out 2002
Guns Canadian followed by Belgium German and then American (and one or two from others) in that order
Boats Domestic/British.
And before you argue in the past they only use majority US after the UK bought Canada Sherman’s as payment for Sextions. As they built everything else themselves.
The Canadian service rifle is basically just an m16a3. And anyways, Canada’s closest ally is the US. I like Canadians. Idk why we gotta conflict about this. Canada will probably never be added, and since the jets are all export American, why can’t they go in the US tech tree. And yeah you are right about the LAV series.
A typical ground line-up will include aircraft as well. The point is. Combine ADATS (already in the tree) with the LAV and a Leopard and you have 3/4 of a good well rounded Canadian line-up. Throw the CF-18 in there and its complete.
Thats the point of it. To not spread Canada across 3 nations for the sake of the US getting another F-18. If they need an export variant, then they could have Australia or Spain. They dont need Canada as well. Its already a bit messed up that the Canadian leopard went to Germany and Instead Britain got the Indian T-90. It makes no sense.
whilst True. Many RAF pilots did and still do train in Canada. Likewise I think Canadian Pilots come and train over here as well. It cannot be dismissed that there is still a lot of overlap between Canada and Britain’s airforces. Not too mention the fact they are both a commonwealth member and a commonwealth realm
I mean they could add the USMC LAV with 30mm to the US, would be a nice counterweight to the btr-80. Id like to see a Spanish hornet or Australian one as a squad or event for usa, only 1 Spanish vehicle in game rn
Absolutely no reason why they cant add both. Add the USMC one to the US and add the Canadian one to Britain. and we are desperate for IFVs currently.
Precisely. Spanish stuff unfortunately doesnt have a good logical home like canada or even Australia does. (though I do partially suspect Spain as a new TT at somepoint)
So a Spanish F-18 to the US as SQV/Event and leave the CF-18 with Britain. Everyone wins
Id like to see the Spanish one in the US as sq or event, and the Australian in Britain as it’s a Commonwealth country instead, but yeah your 100% right. Glad this argument ended nicely, that pretty rare to see
Because you are trying to tell me I should accept never been able to make a line up an be a 1DL in every mode.
And all those American jets are built by Canadair and considered unique variants. We have an example in game: CL-13 which is a Canadian plane.
I’m fighting to keep my stuff together. Well Canada has more then enough for a tech-tree and can even hold an ANZAC sub-tree. The UK is the best place that doesn’t split the country as of right now.
Closest ally my butt. Not lately after the last guy definitely.
And if you want a good air connection Canada lead the Commonwealth Air Training Program. And effectively still dose.
Tho it’s been the bane of my existence making a Canada air tree. And why did Canada build so many bombers. I got like 6 in every prop BR.
Yep. I really do understand your argument, 2023 has kinda sucked with so many F-16s thrown about (has made VID impossible in SB) and it was the same with the F4s before it. But now and then, 1 or 2 C&Ps just adds some seasoning to a nation that might be a little lacking. (and it can give great representation to an otherwise under represented one, who is currently a bit orphanned in game)
I really dont want much, I didnt actually really want the Gripen even. Would have gladly taken Sea harrier over it. But I will admit, something the like the F-111 does look intersting, I would enjoy flying it, but I dont want to grind out the US tree for it and it alone currently.
Yeah, that was always unlikely. besides we do have the TSR2 that would fulfil the same BR as that. But F-111C could be cool, especially with the right loadouts it could sit apart from the Tornado Gr1 and somewhere in between the Gr1 and Gr4
Between Meteor/Vampire and Hunter we are lacking turn fighters. There are native options but something like the CF-86 would be a solid option too. Might even be a solid turn fighter in the BR9 range actually.