BUK M3 is ridiculously unreliable

Why do you guys even engage with this bait

1 Like

FML after all this time finally someones asking the real questions. i feel enlightened. cya and thx my good sir

This forum has many people that have some extremely awful takes, so you never know if someone’s baiting or being serious when looking at his first post.

i’ve been reading this cesspit for the last 10 minutes and it’s all just bottom of the barrel bait bruh

4 Likes

You really care about stats which doesnt mean anything, that just makes you seem petty.

i love ragebaiting russian mains, its not very hard.

All jibber jabber aside, Buk-M3 is in a pretty sorry state at the moment

im just munching some delicious chips while hoping this guy is going through ppls profiles in panic to find that one mysterious dude with a K/D better than 1 :-D or that maybe he actually comes round the corner with some real tricks up his sleeves how to make this cursed thing work better.

2 Likes

It worked like a charm.

ragebaiter recognizes ragebaiter

Its cute to watch you try to gain composure, you thought really hard about it, and failed terribly

Your mind control abilities are insane Mr Vader. Ill be shattered by this episode for weeks now. The internet is my life.

Touch grass

at this point the dude is just wasting time trying to rage bait. he’s just wasting his time and our time at the same time.

Buddy boy in here took a break from being cannon fodder in game.

Why do you keep responding then?

guys can we go back to discussing whats wrong with the buk-m3 and what can/should be done to fix it

As soon as someone introduces you to the definition of Irony™ ;-)

unreliable? that russian propaganda simulator vehicle can lock, track and kill planes that ARE SITTING ON GROUND ON AIRFIELD…

The claws is worse in every way that isn’t aim9x and size, I’ve never seen a single but play the game properly, they’re always bunched up close together and get destroyed by a single barrage. Foxes aren’t great but not I’ve never seen one even try,

Buk isnt particularly bad, every anti air is pretty much useless, if pantsir is anywhere like the tor i would stick to that, I have much better experience with saclos than with these buggy pieces of crap that are multi Sam systems

What you answered is pretty hard to understand and/or incoherent. While i would like to understand what you wrote i would have to guess.
Especially

and

are hard to make sense of (no offense id genuinely like to know what you mean)

first one is buk id have to guess?
Foxes? Fox 3s?
Every anti air is pretty much useless as in? CAS still stronger? the aas not working?

As for

Samp-T, IRIS-t and Type 03 work pretty well (within their limitations ofc). Fox3 missiles can be notched and multipathed, type 03 is a medium to long range spaa while there are no medium to long range targets (same problem that the BUK has) and none of them work in any way reliably vs ldircm equipped helis.
But as for radar-missile interaction the SAMP-T works miles better than the BUK