Best SAM for years bud even after the tweaks it is still excellent, a good Pantsir player is a threat to even the new super CAS systems. It’s funny because what caused this arms race was Pantsir and Kh-38. No Kh-38 no need for IRIS-T, Spyder or any of the other new SAMS. If Gaijin had just had the throught hey maybe we should just remove this clearly broken addition. But no we power creeping and in a few updates time it will be Patriot and S-300s.
Adding 30SM without it would be more than enough.
New AAs were needed anyways as other countries needed something to counter the UFOs. I don’t think OTOMATIC is any good against Rafale.
The VT-1 can hit at 12, but it bricks up past 8 and loses energy. The Pantsir bricks up AT 12. The effective range of most F&F weapons is 8 or less.
Many RWR cannot pick it up. Even more can’t detect the firing of the missile.
I have not experienced full locks dropping, only brief chaff scrambling. Even then, it’s bearable.
The BUK has already been shown hitting aircraft at 70 kilometers in testing. Even if we assume it can’t do that reliably, that still means half the distance outranges the new SPAA by OVER double. It is just so blatantly strong.
Only since the start of June. I’m fine with the BUK being added, but this missile is too much. If they give other SPAA better missiles to compete, fine, but they refused to give Israel a 40km missile because, and I quote, “submitted as a suggestion”.
Why is Russia allowed to have a radar missile on this level when others have theirs remain as unused suggestions while they’re currently at the bottom of 12.0 SPAA effectiveness?
DIRCM, as currently modelled, is completely fictional. Missile Sci-Fi shields do not exist. DIRCM can stop a single missile or two at once, not more.
I remember there were discussions about two types of guidance being completely scrambled by it, but I can’t remember what it was if Laser and TV aren’t affected.
IR of missile type, the circle, so the one that could be flared, and IIR of AGM type, the cross in a square, for example spike, that could not be flared. It works on both.
It is not that simple.
SALH seekers operate on different wavelengths than the IR systems, so LDIRCM will not work in that case.
For example, missile seeker operates in 3-5μm, while the laser designator in 1.06μm.
If it matches, there is also the fact laser designators are coded, so the DIRCM would had to either match the coding, or brute force itself.
So a short answer is no.
It was, for a long time, able to effortlessly guide up to 18 kilometers without issue. That changed long after it was added.
The ASTER currently has a radar bug that makes it unable to see past 20 kilometers.
It’s bugged and unfinished. The SPYDER’s missile said 80 kilometers when it was added, but now it barely hits 20km. Until the ASTER can be properly tested, I cannot give any confidence in the answers regarding it. The BUK, as it currently stands, is capable of hitting at 70 kilometers right now on DEV.
I will admit that the BUK struggles at close range (within 2km), but most of the modern SPAA do and don’t have the same maximum range capability.
And the MiG 23 dunked on the F-4E
The M1 was great when added and then the T-80U was basically it’s equal it was the Leopard 2A5 that started the tank arms race.