Infact we should know who is behind the screen so we can give feedback
Petition to stop playing the Abrams and Leopards if the devs intend to not fix this issue.
we should know the username or at least have a clear designator as we’ve had an issue where a manager was refusing info to buff nations out of a bias before and we really shouldn’t have the possibility of it happening again
Now the problem is to get gaijin to do it
which is unlikely given how gaijin do things
For this cycle, sure. But Historically there have been others where feedback was gathered for topics that don’t relate to map changes.
Not, really no. What is interesting though is that the revision didn’t actually fix any of the multitude of accepted bug reports that concern missing or improperly modeled modules, that one might expect to be fixed with an overhaul like this.
Which is slightly odd considering the ages of the various reports in question.
Some explanation as to why / how they came to the decision to make these changes. When they are apparently at odds with community expectations would be nice. And also where exactly they intend to draw the line.
I’m sure there would be similar issues raised if the “Charge” component of two part ammo was adjusted to always cause an ammo detonation if at all damaged.
So what exactly is going on?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/75boeQ8Rw2EG
Can we truly say that anything else was expected?
Ain’t surprised at all.
I can see this going one of two ways, claiming that these elements are already included in one of the existing modules (ignoring the fact that if anything it should as per the new precedent mean that, that module should also disable the traverse).
or just not responding at all.
Somehow they’re responding during the first 24H which seems like they’ve been told to look for certain bug reports and shut them down.
It’s time to stop playing any M1 series tank.
Not the absolute end of the world for me at least, but it sucks to reach those levels of passive protest.
After that, the only remaning step isn’t the best for neither Gaijin or the game, but it definitely should be on the table if they don’t reason.
I’ve stopped months ago, it made me more cheerful, i only play the HSTV-L just to spawn an F16C that’s it, everything else is pure hell.
i will not be buying premium then
They can stop playing if they want to We should be able to say that we are not their bong
There’s people who play this game that have served and specialized on these vehicles like former USMC tank commander and certified Abrams development specialist Conte_Baracca that have said that the way the turret basket is modeled with the horizontal traverse is incorrect and separate. I’d recommend Gaijin to consult with said people when making certain changes to the Abrams or any other tank. They’re a primary source, especially him. Gaijin literally dedicated a page to him when the Abrams was released. This issue should be considered a model error and hopefully it is corrected by the time the update drops. If it becomes the extra armor, could be a very beneficial buff for the Abrams crew against spalling. They should also really consult him on other Abrams-related reports.
I can’t speak for the Leopard but I’m sure there’s someone of similar background that could provide the facts on it.
Indeed.
Sadly, a select part of the community took it WAY too far by Doxxing the staff members and harassing them even on their personal social media accounts, so… yeah, Gaijin naturally took this measure to protect them.
Do you think they have realized what’s going on yet?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IhJ0lAuJ6vG4
I knew it just a matter of time until the next west nerf and i was right
When usa win rates started to raise up they get nerfed hmm very intresting
historical hah? Cool but where my anti era again? It also historical why it isn’t in the game yet?
Also to many sources around here said turret busket is not part of the horizontal drive so how it stop turret from moving when damage?
Nah uh its gonna nerf russia badly gaijin cant do that