There is no reason why t32’s should have this long ass reload for a mediocre gun , having to fight stabilized soviet and british shit in this is just painfull , your fighing sabot and composite sometimes , and you also don’t even have rangefinder to help a little bit on longer range combats so the 14.5 reload (with ace crew) is just dumb shit specially when you have to go for apcr lots of times to even be able to pen with certain consistency against some vehicles such as the t55’s where the T41 round just pens the cupola and kills only the commander for some reason…
With the APCR
With APBC
And even on tanks from the same BR range like the T44 the T43 round doesn’t even fuse for some reason
No logic behind a 90mm gun to have such an slow fire rate at this high of a BR , I get that you can’t lower the BR of this thats why im not asking for the BR to be lower , but its not really that fu nto play a vehicle so mediocre like it
The big difference between the 2 US 90mms around 6.7-7.3 is one-part shells or two. The problem is that the reload DOUBLES for two part shells, which is both unrealistic and rather confusing. The point of two part shells was to reduce the weight of the shell components to make loading easier. All long 90s should have a fire rate increase. And lets be honest, the T26E1 could use the buff. It wasn’t amazing at 6.3, got upteired for no reason, and has suffered since. Strictly worse than a tiger 2H
The one thing I dislike about pershing family is that you often get one-shot from rounds penetrating your idler wheel, and when you simulate that angle yourself you can only see non-pen in the simulation.
Well even in the same br range it is pretty bad as i said, those centurions, m48s can easily pen you like your just an medium tank at best , yet you have to in some cases aim for weakspots and well, if you dont get that one shot your dead cuz they can shoot twice in 1 reload of yours
The T26E1 was great at 6.3, but yes it is worse than the Tiger II H in general.
I think a 10s reload would be good for the T26E1 and T32 but I can’t see why they should receive a buff but not the IS-2 / IS-3 / IS-4 / IS-6.
They get a much more potent round but their 20s/24s reload is quite abysmal. I think reducing it to 17/18s would be great, especially for the 6.7 IS-2, which is arguably even worse than the T26E1 other than being able to survive more bombs, being able to sidescrape with the rear / side armour and having a more flexible MG.
