In my opinion, yes. Are you planning to use them for ground RB?
If a target is too heavily armoured to be killed with a RP-3, the AP rockets may be good. But the RP-3s will deal with most targets. Vampire with RP-3s at 7.3, before the accuracy nerfs, was a beast in Ground RB.
Historically i remember to have read that the AP rockets was preferred for anti-shipping or anti-submarine duties.
Yes, I just figured out yesterday the sea hawk gets access to custom load outs.
You can probably get a couple of hits and crits with the AP rockets, but i suggest using the RP-3s. While still fairly inaccurate, they will overpressure some vehicles.
Thx.
Sadly it’s has a severe weight limit on the ordnance so that you can only take 2000lbs of bombs plus a few rockets.
You exceed the weight limit if you take 2x1000 and 2x500 bombs
It has to be 2x1000 OR 4x500, but then you can only take 3 or 4 rockets.
That or a full load of rockets and just 2x500lb bombs
Does anyone know if the Buccaneer (S.1, S.2, and now the S.2B) can maintain flight without flaps, at least until an emergency landing? In game, when you rip off the flaps, the aircraft doesn’t respond to any commands and crashes. It loses all maneuverability. I just wanted to know if this is the expected behavior or if it could be improved.
Bucc has flaperons, so when you rip them you cant roll. As the tail also drops you lose a chunk of it also hindering performance. As for irl i have no idea, but there might have been a system that prevented extension over the safe angle
2B is yet to get usual AB br increase for planes with bobms. Gvie it time
Is the buccaneer 2b lasar pod suppose to get thermals?
No. The Pave Spike pod just had a TV camera
Buc S2B Bug report. RWR doing wierd things when targetted by a AF Roland. Its showing as “wr_threa” which I assume is not what is meant to be displayed
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/raeSRoTfSyEs
This also happens a lot against ground targets
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RDpEDW9EHG3n
I’ve made a report on the incorrect CE protection of the ROMOR-A ERA
Oh, well good luck
I can give you more pictures from the trials if you want (in colour)
also janes and international defense review that state it blocks 127mm shaped charge
I’m aware of the colored photos from The Dead District blog. I’ve decided not to include them in the report. Actually, I believe the content of this blog comes from the user Object-477 on Weibo: 微博. There are many posts from this user, perhaps even classified information. It’s better not to talk about…
The point is, this was already reported in 2018 and TrickZZter himself acknowledged the issue and one developer (BVV_d) said they would fix it. The problem is, it never happened. My report is more of a reminder…
By the way, do you know where the following image is from? I wanted to add it.
i am also unable to find info about this table
Finding anything about this is a nightmare. Besides what Object-477 posted, there’s probably nothing else publicly available on the internet. In fact, the only other place I found the same information apart from Object-477 was in the 2018 bug report when the developer BVV_d posted some images that seem to be photocopies of the material. The filename also indicates this, “EPSON”.
I also found this cover, which might be from this document:
Interesting
I did a little digging, and i cant find anything about the Epson. Wonder what that is.
