Clearly you both disagree on how much weight each claim should have and throwing the same justification at each other is achieving nothing. Agree to disagree and move on.
7 Likes
Unrelated question is the sea harrier FA.2 HUD AOA indicator equivalent to degrees or is it units add.
And is there a conversion?
Nothing matches the AV-8A g capability chart that was used to model the harriers G capabilities. In terms of AOA for speed equaling G
Still only answered the guy that asked why a german one got passed.
If people wouldnt react negatively to it and wouldnt make a big deal out of it, we wouldnt need to tell them the sources.
I wasn’t directing my comments at either side. Pack it in, both of you.
15 Likes
Ajax spall liner when ?? :)
1 Like
When Vatniks leave the British Parliament
might as well be “wrong vehicle bug report” with the amount of missing features this this has
Yea no, heres the biggest issue with game
The Apache’s DIRCM?
The report for the spall liner has been accepted, we must just wait and see
I say that but the Chally 2 spall liner reports have been ignored for well over a year now
5 Likes
sad times
Yea, no other Apache is capable of carrying that irl except for bock 6.5, which is only used by the US. Every other Apache is either a 4.0 or 4.5 depending on the nation. Which means all of these other 64Es are entirely in capable of carrying JAGMS and DCIRM.
as soon as the other vehicles get their spall liner that have the report.
In other Ajax news
https://x.com/JonHawkes275/status/2011779130191122852
5 Likes
well. seems like everything considered it is staying
2 Likes
british apaches are definitely capable of carrying JAGM considering it’s the weapon the MoD selected for them lmao
6 Likes
Iirc, if you can equip some of the later models of Hellfire, you can equip JAGM.
So the AH-64Ds (Ah Mk1) probably could too
And the no-show update bug is affecting me here. So, here is a comment to fix that.
Was going to ask for a full list of wrong names(so it wasn’t a pointless comment) as I have incorrect names bug reports on my mind right now, but that’s probably pointless as I bet half the tree is affected.
I agreed with everything the MP said in there other than his assertion that Ajax would stay because it had to. Absolutely no it doesn’t as me and @l2ulan discussed in a discord, the army with their exceptionalist fantastical ideas could have a perfectly good vehicle that nearly every other NATO nation uses without trouble off the shelf. (I also disagreed when he said its best in class, my friend, its the worst new AFV/IFV in NATO, similar situation to CR2 where its heavily over-stated)
He claimed it would take a decade to get a new vehicle, we could have 200 CV-90’s or KF-41s by the end of the year with another 800 orders for domestic production by the end of 2 years if the urgency was there and they made the decision.
If they pivoted to CV-90/KF-41 it would work because its a good vehicle being forced into the UK’s oddly specific doctrine, which frankly, can be adapted.
If the Army was forced to adopt an alternative, whether that’s CV-90 (my preferred choice), PUMA or KF-41 they could absolutely make it work.
Only area of contention is which option to pick, and what turret to go with, from an urgency PoV an off the shelf turret is optimal, from a strategic and export PoV as well as ROI and manufacture rights, I still believe a CTA 40 turret by LMUK should be selected. I’d personally rather they order the hulls and work out the turret into low-rate production as we go, because LMUK have proven 8 times by @Sebbo_the_Plebbo 's count that they can do this, over and over again.
1 Like
That i did forget the dutch and brits bought it, but the Chinese one is a blk 4 which never had the avionics needed.