Also, I wouldn’t. DCS doesn’t have a navy phantom yet and in comparison to the phantom, everything else floats. The 4’s just a total brick.
Hmm, it’s indeed easier to land at that speed, but my landing gear breaks. Well, I’ll just have to keep trying.
Lol, that’s true.
turns out it gets worse.
What the hell is the accuracy on that CT40 …
That’s the french thingy right?
You know they cant aim :P
it might be a firing fully auto thing, the first shot of the jaguar looks reasonably true, but subsequent are poor,
Ajax only fired the 40mm with single shots there
At 35 seconds it looks like full auto and it looks okay
That’s the chain gun
1 Like
Ah, fair enough for that then
yeah wanted to mention with the full auto as well, doesnt look like it, the slow mo makes it realy hard.
well never mind if its a complete different cannon you showed off.
So still a big yikes on the CT 40 front
1 Like
chain cannon being the 7.62mm i assume?
yup
1 Like
yeah and thats the main problem, nobody just shoots 1 round with an autocannon.
Even more so when they specialy wanna use 40mm for more penetration capability etc
Not even that, the first two or so shots are on target, then it walks off to the right before correcting back left while remaining relatively in the same plane. Which indicates operator or software/mounting error rather than anything with the gun itself, given we have nothing else to go on I’d hazard a guess at operator error.
this is Shini being Shini and trying to whine about the CT40/British industry again and making a big deal out of a nothing burger, note they posted it here and not in the Jaguar thread cause they know they’d get called out on it lmao
6 Likes
well no, the french part
i didnt even think about that honestly, i just talk more british members, as it affects them as well
I dont know if its operator problem etc, i only see a bad firing gun, i recently found those posts about the Ajax and its possible poor barrel wear and needing quick replacements.
This is just a continuation of it, since for a long time the Ajax was in fact a problematic development project
I did not have any notorious actions behind this. I just wanted to share information about the gun i found. Me not posting it in the french jaguar stuff is cause i do not care about the french.
But i care about the british possibly having a bad system in real life that could miss the mark on its performance and could lead to real life problems.
I did no go as far as to actualy analyse the pattern how the gun missed, i just saw a freaking gun completly missing its target
Honestly i feel like your slight bias on my canada / australian stand, plays a huge role into your analysation and my intention of me posting it here
1 Like
Rant on
Not really british, but rather french
He’s always spreading borderline fake / out of context info all the time
Off the top of my head I have :
- CT40 not accurate and short lifespan (but it’s basically the same as bofors 40mm)
- Leclerc can’t get SHARD APFSDS cause it’s not bought by the french army yet (KF-51 in the german tree is fine though)
- Rafale bad because shot down (no context, no nothing)
- SAMP/T doesn’t work you-know-where (actually a bug caused by the battery being made with a mix of french and italian elements, fixed after two weeks)
- ASCALON 140 bad, Rhm 130 good, because low chamber pressure (that one is the funniest). Larger HE shells ? Potential ability to carry missiles ? Growth potential ? Who cares i suppose, not important on an IRL battlefield
It’s not really surprising he does not post on french threads anymore, he usually gets debunked in a matter of minutes, so he resorts to attack shared programs with anything french inside instead, at least that’s the pattern i’m seeing…
Rant off
7 Likes
Eh, both then I guess, I’ve only really seen the junk they’ve posted about Ajax and Challenger 3. Poorly sourced and usually taken out of context. I’m just tired of it really :/
5 Likes
heh fair enough, maybe he does it with everything non german
Never bothered to check to be honest X)
3 Likes
Aye fair, it’d be more effort than it’s worth.
Now I should probably have something to eat, hope you all have a good evening/day/morning!
2 Likes
How am i doing that again lol.
I nearly never write about other nations lol.
U literaly brought later sources that said as well that it holds 900 apfsds rounds. But when i wrote that its false. Sure fine.
Never said it cant get it. I only said its not the active service ammunition and france doesnt plan to use it. Strv122s dont get Dm 53 either in the game. Ammunition is mostly based on the actual service ammunition.
Thats just how the game works with weird exceptions like premium 2a4M KE-W.
Tech tree standardly dont get it.
Vehicles going to developer is quite normal on the other hand.
I only posted to it getting shot down, u are thinking to much into it. Like literaly the eurofighter, ragale beaf is quite common thats not a me issue. Hell half the people in thisbthread got warned for that already.
Dont think i ever wrote sth about the french sam system specialy u might remember that one wrong?
Age old debate as well. Thats not borderline fake or out of context wither.
No i just dont care enough.
The hell kind of junk did post about the chally 3.
I only shared information that was released from the rheinmetall side abiut the upgrade.
Everything else i hold back since i dont know.
The only issue that might have been was cause i called it the rheinmetall upgraded chally cause of the gun.
Which to some might come over as disregarding the british part of the project. Which was not the intention and for that i apologise if that was the case.
Chally 130 on the otherhand, i only spoke the truth.
Only things i ever posted about the ajax was mentioning how at one point of development it deafened the crew i think?
The barrel wear and now the spread info.
U make it sound like its a regular thing, which it is not.
No i generaly keep away of stuff i dont know enough about normaly.
In case of the british i just cared about them and feeled like i was close enough to discuss it.
I guess not.
Still believe your general dislike cause of my canadian/ australia opinion plays a bigger role into this bias.
But british equipment and the handling of canada / australia are complete different issues in my opinion