British Weapon Systems - Technical data and discussion

Yeah… Or 11.0 because Gaijin… and “it has APS” Its the kind of thing I fully expect them to do.

But we can hope they are smart

at least we’d have Warrior CSP that we could have for that gap if thats the case

Is ljdam also affected? Ive had them just climb into space completely ignoring all targetting

Is that the one with the same cannon as the new jaguar?

yep

I beleive so

I know GBU-54Bs are affected. Included in that report is a clip by Dontkev of them showing the affect. Checking other LJDAM variants like the GBU-62, they all have 10’000 d/s track rates, so more than likely also affected

That’d be quite nice that cannon is pretty insane

Man hoe annoying. Lgbs are already very off meta st least if they worked.

They might be at higher BRs, but lower BRs… Id call them the meta.

Too date, my preference at 10.3/10.7 is Mk13s from the Jag and at 11.7 it would be Mk13s from the Tonka.

But currently, neither are usable as CAS. Period.

Its infuritating

Q5 with lgbs is pretty strong

I want all our CTA40 endeavours tbh

Spoiler

Boxer LM40 turret
17614790333584483712128674600969
Patria LM40 turret


AJAX IFV

BlackJax
17614791373635542056460234317571
Warrior CSP/Warrior 2
17614791637272982012950751768939
Tracer SIKA and Lancer FMP
17614792455194236232872485524186

(Maybe CTAI Bradley)
17614792973214049027293608463384
BAE FRES SV
image

2 Likes

You brits really like the CTA40 apperently

beats the RARDEN

we’ve had it since the 90s we really wanted it to work lol

RARDEN is love, RARDEN is life sir.

also, strikemaster is love, is life, etc, help the cause for the funni

Aermacchi MB-326K gets suu/11(?) miniguns, can the Strikemaster too?

2 Likes

are you talking about the ALR-94?

having the F-35B as the same program was a huge mistake imo. an F/A-18 and F-16 replacement as modifications of the same airframe makes sense, but the AV-8 is too different

was active skyflash an actual weapon used in british service or was it just a mockup.

Im not sure if a seeker was actually ever built for it. Let alone an actual test fire occur Flame or Gunjob would know though and I genuinely have no idea either way.

But from what I recall. it was a serious endeavour, that would have held a few advantages over Aim-120A (mostly a seeker with different strengths and weaknesses) but ultimately would have been a Skyflash with ARH (its probably got the SuperTEMP upgrades, but im not sure) and thus far more limited in range. In the end it was decided that it wasnt worth it and the project was scrapped in favour of just buying Aim-120 instead. Though iirc, parts of it lived on in the Meteor, the Ramjet concept was originally concieved for a Skyflash upgrade or something.

In-game… It could allow for an ARH slinger at 12.7 for Britain (Maybe 12.3 on a weak enough platform, but that would probably be pushing it quite a bit), but there isnt really a good option for that which wouldnt benefit more with just sticking with Skyflash DFs at a much lower BR, like the Hawk

1 Like

Active service? No, flight trials etc yes. But then we selected AMRAAM and abandoned ASF. Tornado F.3 maintained controls for ASF in its weapons system until it left service. Wasn’t even removed in a software update the manual just says don’t use it not selected.

6 Likes