It might go to a BR where the gun works.
Who am I kidding, the gun will do nothing to a panther followed by 40mm aphe overpressuring it from an aa truck.
Meanwhile they still haven’t fixed the Caernarvon being near 7 tons heavier than it should be…
Reports and mistakes only ever seem to go one way with our tree.
The Conq is one I’m surprised lasted as long as it did, I remember a report on the stab back on the old forum when I still bothered to get things fixed.
(Cent 10 is still missing its correct inner mantlet)
hey im not that fat :-(
13 Likes
Finally found a source for how much filler 76mm HESH has, with 1.2kg of Comp A, that makes it fairly comparable to the 90mm HESH of the Aubl-74.
Dropping it here so I don’t forget.
(Specifically page 116)
5 Likes
Hello guys, is there a dircm on any British helicopter? The American Apache has this system, and the Russian MI 28 NM has it, but is there a similar system on British helicopters?
Only the Chinook at the moment iirc. But our AH-64Es remain fully compatible, with any luck they’ll give us DIRCM for sake of balance. Though I do reckon it will be unlikely
1 Like
What’s your source for the Caernarvon being too heavy? I’m not doubting you im just curious, I dont see a bug report
does the asraam have a guidance delay? Ik sraam has .2 second delay, but surely asraam improves on it and has something like a .15 second delay similar to r73, mica, 9x etc.
I see that camm has a 1.2 second guidance delay, but i would chalk that up to being a sam version of the asraam.
As far as I can tell, the only modern ir missiles to have 0 delay are the iris t variants (in game, idk about irl)
source?
how do they get around not slamming into the launching aircraft?
i think he means they can be integrated ofc
actually rn, stuff like r-73s, micas and r-77s etc phase through the air craft lol
1 Like
well you can technically integrate JASSM onto a Vietnam era B-52. doesnt mean it should come like that ingame
i mean just look at swiss hornets, israeli f-15i etc etc. because an airframe is compatible they can get it if gaijin deems it so
too bad they dont model it
for those 2 examples, there was nothing showing the necessary electronics were removed iirc. But for the UK AH-64E, there is no evidence that the necessary modifications were made
1 Like
It has some, but I dont know it, maybe others do.
That is just gaijin made up thing, that should be changed, as CAMM has <1km min range (unspecified exactly), while in game the delay causes it to miss.
2 Likes
https://www.boeing.co.uk/news-releases/2025/boeing-delivers-final-united-kingdom-apache-e-model
I see references to upgrading the Ah1 (ah64D but with British modifications) to the Ah 64E standard? But no specific mentions of special or unique modifications to it that would prevent the British Apache not being compatible with JGAM?
This article also talks about the Ah64 E in British service having JAGM but not Brimestone due to an unnessecary duplication of capability and the general state of the UK Military industry. However they have tested both on the Ah64 E so in WT we should get both JGAM and Brimestone in about 3 years time when the Brit TT gets its Ah64 E.
1 Like
As far as I’m aware, JAGM is our planned main anti-tank weapon for the AH64E
Brimstone was trialed but was deemed pointless to integrate when JAGM was already integrated and offered similar performance
The British Apache should technically get:
- Hellfires
- JAGM
- Brimstone (as they were tested)
3 Likes