British Weapon Systems - Technical data and discussion

Wing fuel tanks for the phantoms would already help a lot

1 Like

we lost 💔

1 Like

Its a real shame they went for centre line first

3 Likes

gaijin, where is my BLU-27 in FGR2/FG1 ?

Is there any reason why the beam riding missiles on the ZT3A2 can’t be fired on the move?

I was under the impression beam riding missiles (like on the BPM-2M) weren’t limited to having to stop to fire

I think its due to having a stabiliser and not beam riding, though few things follow that rule, like the Stormer is Stabilised and should be able to fire when moving but cant due to Gaijin

I guess

The ZT3A2 however does also have a dual axis stabiliser.

Perhaps its just another example of British vehicles getting shafted for no reason

We do not have a 100% undeniable proof. We have a Brochure of the missile itself that states it can be fired on the move, right next to ZT3A2 picture, but Gaijin says their Consultant states it can’t.

1 Like

If its an official brochure that should be sufficient proof, but I guess gaijin thinks not

Has the same thing been said for the Starstreak?

1 Like

We do not have anything about Starstreak

1 Like

I thought we did.

Not that i recall.

They say it is not conclusive enough
obraz_2024-08-03_122343687

7 Likes

When we getting the BL755 anti amour bomb. Its not like it was the staple bomb for CAS in the cold war for a lot of NATO nations or anything.

When Gaijin somehow manages to make CBU’s work and not crash laptop users out of the game

I mean we have rockets how much harder could it be.

Many many many times larger

The bomblets are smaller then rockets by a decent bit

Harrier GR.5A equipped TIALD pod (TIALD A or TIALD 200) ?

And Harrier GR.7 from great britain tech tree used TIALD 400 or 500 ?

if you can handle the amount of flak in top tier naval battles you will be able to handle cluster bombs