honestly thats the only reasonable thing we can do. We can guess/assume its Tungsten or DU, depending on the round used, say "it must be able to penetrate this thickness according to the docs and say thats what the projectile must weigh and what speed it must go.
I don’t understand how nations with more resteictive regimes in terms of national security and document security are supposed to have a chance of fixing stuff
The only realistically fair stance would be for gaijin to say "hey look we know nothing really other than this this and this, we’ll aim to balance vehicles by giving them this this and these factors stats whatever to make them all equal.
Can everyone do us a favour and en-masse report the issues with HMS Peacock/ LÉ Orla. They’re too slow and have no ammo. If the Bussard can have 400 rpg then so can we.
I already tried to report it back in the day pointing out the ‘human mistake’ as they obviously copy-pasted the gun from that Sparviero italian premium boat without even considering a slight difference in vessels sizes, but a certain tech mod closed it instantly, because even for such an obvious issue you have to provide all the docs in the world for them to even bother taking a look at it. (I don’t have any docs on the matter, and neither have I seen any posted anywhere)
Also while at it you may take a look at Fairmile D (697) 2.7 boat and its torpedos, then check the same torpedos on any plane that carries them, like Firecrest, Wyvern or Firebrand, just for yet another confirmation on what kind of attitude the devs have towards british tech.
My favourite though is still Alecto’s HEAT penetration, a solid proof, that gaijin’s staff flat out doesn’t know, how to read, it’s like the guy was looking through all the docs available to find the lowest possible value to put into the game, didn’t bother that 110mm is for 30 degree.
funny fact, someone did actually report the torpedo issue on the old forums, like a week before they were closed. i dont think we will be seeing that change any time soon
as for the peacock/orla ammo count and speed, they have been reported before but as usual it was denied for the same silly reason.
EVEN funnier is that they actually had 56 kmh top speed, but that is the “sprint” speed, which is temporary (even if it can maintain this speed for extended periods)
Because Gaijin has decided the Skyflash can’t be in the same class as the AIM-7F/M (in the same way that it has a worse seeker than the 7F wtf) because of the range disparity probably.
Yeah I mean I’d assume so, Skyflash basic mind you is 2 years later than AIM-7F, compared to E2 it has “improved electronics” as well as the obvious inverse monopulse seeker, improved proximity fuze seems odd they gave 15s and only to Supertemp? Not the basic one?
Atm the only thing Skyflash does better than AIM-7F I think is track rate?
I dunno you can compare the AIM-7E2, F and Skyflash and Supertemp here at your own convinience
