Valkyr H.20
1 Like
I think it having a search radar puts it at 8.0 minimum. The radar on the falcon should have search function but only in the direction your looking and the sidam has nothing so you sat spamming T 5 1 for the entirety of the game.
i hit 2000 kills in the black night. lets celebrate with spall liners and a ready rack
2 Likes
I dont see how people put this many games into one vehicle, guess my autism just aint strong enough for the likes of you guys.
its the black night i made it a mission
The jet im closest to getting 1000 games in is the sea vixen with the Canberra being second… may be the other way round cant remember.
i dont have 1000 games in a jet. satan himself cant even make me do that
Back before large maps and when it had an air spawn (like how all bombers should) i was actually able to reach bases fairly often in it making it a perfect sl and rp grinder (getting 30k rp a game wasnt out of the question). I would slap a film on and just bomb bases in it, was relaxing and very easy to do, now your always facing uptiers with mf su 7s being a lower br than you now…
in terms of gun, its a worse M163, but it gets a better tracking radar, and a search radar
would function as a radar guided Luchs or R3 T20 most likely
i don’t see it being better than Shilka at 8.0
Apparently its 20mms are like the Hispanos you see on the 4.3 TCM-20, so to me its definitely a 7.7,
1 Like
The zsu 37-2 is simply retarded and should not be any lower than a fucking shilka, especially when its so good at killing tanks as well (genuinly pisses me off whenever i have to face that shit). But 8.0 br is just where i think gaijin will put it due to the search radar not that i think it couldn’t be 7.7.
Hey everyone quick question, is there anything thats actually stopping the Harrier Gr.7 from equipping sidewinders on all eight pylons? The pylons look like they can mount them so is it wiring or what?
Wiring and / or avionics, there is no point hanging a missile on a pylon if the aircraft’s systems won’t talk to it.
It should be able to carry 6 sidewinders though.
5 Likes
is there anything known about the TSR .2’s HUD?
I have some stuff on it in the TSR.2 suggestion thread:
There’s this diagram:
Spoiler
Also there’s this 8 minute silent video of the HUD symbology being tested on a static rig: Rochester Avionics Archive
1 Like
India didnt use ZSU-57-2 thank god
Hawk 200 and 209 have been given a versions of Sea Eagle with a fake IR/IIR seeker (instead of the ARH guidance version used on Tornado, Bucc, Hawk RDA etc.)
I guess to enforce the LOBL requirement on radarless planes (looks like they forgot they did actually give Hawk 209 its radar in this update) while maintaining fire-and-forget capability, and not having the missile autonomously seeking targets with its own active radar.
Sounds a lot like the workaround that was considered an absolute no-go for making Brimstone fire-and-forget with an IR seeker in place of its MMW radar seeker.
But is this just for acquisition, or does the missile actively use IR instead of radar as a seeker now?
7 Likes
does this mean i can use it on tanks
Its apparently in the same realm as the KH-38MT
Exists on paper, but never produced or manufactured that we know of.
It’s not a workaround, its another proposed variant. While no proposal or variant of the brimstone ever existe that had an IR seeker.
Its referenced as the P4T Golden Eagle… but the source seems to be mixed in with someone on the secret project forums regarding their alternate universe designation for “what if” projects which another website may have copied
Very sketchy.
It’s because they use IR seeker on aircraft without SEA mode radar.
Not from my testing. You don’t get the IR seeker view for one, and the seeker itself doesn’t seem to actually track anything