It’s a shame you have to waste time researching it and purchasing it just to get to the hornet.
FA.2 is a complete waste of time.
the c late on us also got the slam (thank you for being such a good moderator btw)
1 Like
is the walleye 2 on them new aswell or am i being stupid (you help with challenger reports so you have many thanks but your welcome)
always been there
Are AIM-120Bs also finally in the mix for custom loadouts?
Can see there’s one on the ground display, but no preset loadout with them yet
Also, someone needs to tell Australia to start making better paint jobs for their F-model hornets. Because the two historical ones are not inspiring me to part with 200GE a piece
3 Likes
why would u even want the B over the D though?
Better time to target and pull below 20ish km
same with the tornado paint schemes, i want more than just the fin painted black man…
damn really. is the aim120d that much of a sidegrade.
later AMRAAMs just have weaker acceleration and smaller fins, so they pull less and get to target slower
they do have a larger overall range however, and max speed
fair enough
Whoa the F3 Tornado Leuchars “Treble One” squadron looks fantastic.
1 Like
Gaijin could fix them by reducing the range they go active, like the real one the system selects the best window for going active rather than the flat 20km which Gaijin use.
Were we also not promised a new loft profile “more efficient” yet it looks total crap.
Least the R-77M will also pull like crap as it is not TVC and has teenie tiny fins.
Unfortunately teenie tiny fins at Mach 6 offer an awful lot of lift
Then we are fortunate the R-77M is not a mach 6.0 missile.
Do you know how much a Sea Harriers 190 gallon drop tank weights?
As well as the operating weight of the FA.2?
No idea about the drop tank weights
Number I have for FA.2 empty weight (operational) is 14,500lb/6,577kg but that’s from two secondary sources, not a primary.
Think Gunjob has copies of some of the A.P.s for FA.2
1 Like