British Weapon Systems - Technical data and discussion

(I haven’t even started grinding the Sea Harrier, RIP)

No just the Super Hornets.

Ohk, thanks for the info!!

It’s a shame you have to waste time researching it and purchasing it just to get to the hornet.

FA.2 is a complete waste of time.

the c late on us also got the slam (thank you for being such a good moderator btw)

1 Like

Oh yeah sorry I missed that;


And also thank you :)

5 Likes

is the walleye 2 on them new aswell or am i being stupid (you help with challenger reports so you have many thanks but your welcome)

always been there

Are AIM-120Bs also finally in the mix for custom loadouts?
Can see there’s one on the ground display, but no preset loadout with them yet

Also, someone needs to tell Australia to start making better paint jobs for their F-model hornets. Because the two historical ones are not inspiring me to part with 200GE a piece

Spoiler


3 Likes

5 Likes

why would u even want the B over the D though?

Better time to target and pull below 20ish km

same with the tornado paint schemes, i want more than just the fin painted black man…

damn really. is the aim120d that much of a sidegrade.

later AMRAAMs just have weaker acceleration and smaller fins, so they pull less and get to target slower

they do have a larger overall range however, and max speed

fair enough

Whoa the F3 Tornado Leuchars “Treble One” squadron looks fantastic.

1 Like

Gaijin could fix them by reducing the range they go active, like the real one the system selects the best window for going active rather than the flat 20km which Gaijin use.

Were we also not promised a new loft profile “more efficient” yet it looks total crap.

Least the R-77M will also pull like crap as it is not TVC and has teenie tiny fins.

image

Unfortunately teenie tiny fins at Mach 6 offer an awful lot of lift