We do not have a 100% undeniable proof. We have a Brochure of the missile itself that states it can be fired on the move, right next to ZT3A2 picture, but Gaijin says their Consultant states it can’t.
1 Like
If its an official brochure that should be sufficient proof, but I guess gaijin thinks not
Has the same thing been said for the Starstreak?
1 Like
We do not have anything about Starstreak
1 Like
I thought we did.
Not that i recall.
They say it is not conclusive enough
7 Likes
When we getting the BL755 anti amour bomb. Its not like it was the staple bomb for CAS in the cold war for a lot of NATO nations or anything.
When Gaijin somehow manages to make CBU’s work and not crash laptop users out of the game
I mean we have rockets how much harder could it be.
Many many many times larger
The bomblets are smaller then rockets by a decent bit
Harrier GR.5A equipped TIALD pod (TIALD A or TIALD 200) ?
And Harrier GR.7 from great britain tech tree used TIALD 400 or 500 ?
if you can handle the amount of flak in top tier naval battles you will be able to handle cluster bombs
A single tornado can drop the same number of bomblets as I think half a dozen F-111s firing rockets simultaneously
The server crash when multiple heavy AAA ships fire their AAA at the same time.
That being said. Yes, they need to come soon
Hopefully gajin not forgot implemented Litening III instead Litening II on Gripen C from 3 countries in the winter major update
And the chaff pod for planes like the harrier. I would love most of all if they fixed all of your bug reports they supposedly accepted.
Looks pretty conclusive to me, it couldn’t be a more direct statement from a primary source that it can fire on the move
No, because in their eyes, in 2008, when ZT3 was the only ground carrier of that missile, it is obviously refering to something else.
And there is also the consultant, who might not even exist.
1 Like
The scimitar is so much worse than the fox.
Only because its not modeled correctly just like the harriers.