Not sure the SEP V2 has the “same armor” as an M1A2 due to the ARAT II package, but I do get the point, as it is a modification you can turn on or off.
1 Like
I mean outwith the armour packages, the composite and steels so to speak.
Generally i dont count the TUSK as it doesn’t add much in the way of kinetic protection.
Based on what? Kinetic ERA doing its job means it’s overperforming?
1 Like
Rage bait! Get it while it’s hot!
1 Like
0.5/10 rage bait.
Bit late to the party here, but british bias is undoubtedly fake. Most of the vehicles in the british tech tree are higher BRs or blatantly worse than their counterparts. A few examples of this include the F-111C (worse A2G, weaker engines, and for a while it could only use 4 AIM-9Ls which got changed recently) at the same BR as the F-111F, the Sherman II is identical to the M4A1 but 3.7 opposed to 3.3, the Challengers are among top tier’s worst tanks- Shoot anywhere but the turret cheeks and it should go through, both parts of the 2 piece ammunition blow up, its abysmally slow and the gun+ reload isn’t great. Britain are one of the worse off nations compared to others- such as the “Supersonic” update, where britain got the Javelin (A subsonic) -correct me if I’m wrong- The prototype javelin creating a sonic boom.
1 Like
Don’t forget the solid shot that can’t pen most of its BR, and HESH rounds that do absolutely nothing.
3 Likes
It’s not ragebait, Relikt is an ERA design dedicated to defeating kinetic penetrators and tandem chemical penetrators alike. Anti-ERA tips, which people love to quote when it comes to kinetic ERA, only worked on earlier kinetic ERA designs like Kontakt-5 and similar designs.
2 Likes
Exactly Relikt is designed for that purpose whereas NATO tanks incorporate NERA armour arrays into the armour plates. Yet in game they do not function as they should and the argument is always balance.
Well why should Russian Relikt tanks be immune to NATO APFSDS but an M1A2 SEP/2A7 has a much lower shot resistance.
1 Like
cuz gaijin is from russia
I dont think it would be particularly good for game balance if NATO tanks were immune to 3BM60…
Like they should be
i mean im pretty sure most are immune to 3bm60 frontally
would be stupid to have the same hull you created in the 70s that cant even resist againts 3bm22
the stuff that it was meant to resist against?
in the 70s?
1 Like
They should be but arent. 3BM60 is Russias current mass produced Dart.
NATO tanks are designed to defeat a round of that nature.
Vickers at 8.0.
Enough said.
1 Like
That olifant at 8.3 doesn’t have any flaws against other 8.3, stab, m111, gun handling and the ztz59d1 is close but not with that gun handling, both them met each other there is no armor so olifant actually has things that matter while others don’t lol
1 Like
So many sleeper vehicles under that flag.
It’s smart to keep them under the radar by constantly shifting attention to something else.
1 Like
This can’t be a real thread lol.
1 Like
Theres sleepers in every tree man, they’re well known to most folks.
vicker mk3 is the sleeper for britain, not the mk1
1 Like
ZTZ59D is substantailly better in my experience with them both
The fox was put up to 8.0….
Think about any other nations 8.0 light vehicles, most would have but not limited too, high mobility, similar cannon, thermals/better optics, same scouting, better armour, potentially even ATGMs.
Most nations 8.0-8.7 IFVs would get ALL of these.
Yet one little car with a cannon that has a low rate of fire is up at this br simply because too many people where wining that we actually knew how to play the game.
2 Likes