Britain needs more Indian vehicles

I know but India would be harder to folder
Tbh ground might be what makes me prefer an independent nation
Would make India a nation similar to Israel, with a balanced mix of copypaste and indigenous stuff, a medium/small air tree and a solid ground tree

2 Likes

look at swiss subtree
gaijin just do their want

2 Likes

Where did they put it btw? Didn’t check dev server

the swiss tree is in germany. which consists of hunters (all better than teh british variants while the early F58 should be a copy of an F6), F18s and Mirages.

All to germany

1 Like

I know all that, I meant which line
5th line?

No clue. makes 0 sense regardless

I’m not really informed on that, where should it have been according to you? France and Italy both have a subtree
I didn’t follow discussions on Switzerland

{58B1CADC-569A-43A5-BB21-49A36FFC3806}

2 Likes

Well considering france got benelux out of nowhere, and the dutch military can intergrate with the germany, they really should of gone the damn Dutch in there as a sub tree, NOT the swiss.

The only reason theyre getting hte swiss is ot defend the fact they arbitrarily added the fking Hawker hunter F58 years before the tree was even considered. its just silly.

also that hunter F58 should lose its RWR, as the 1971 model last I checked was essentially the first export F6 to swiss

2 Likes

Kinda awkward, they could’ve moved high tiers of 3rd line to 5th and put Switzerland in 3rd line don’t you think?

3rd line? isn’t that hte line with the MIg29 or is that the 2nd and 3rd line is su22?

3rd is tornado and alphajet

1 Like

I dont know why, they tend to have a habbit of putting sub trees on one side, SA for example in britain.

1 Like

Still better than the current mess it is in Great britain rn

Yeah lol Britain is such a mess… but still since the swiss sub is fighters it should be 3rd line which actually has fighters

2 Likes

Yep, kinda dumb since in this case it’d keep roles in their proper lines

2 Likes

Eh they don’t really bother with that now really, do they?

We do not need indian vehicles. we need British vehicles
Warrior CSP should of been added ages ago.

3 Likes

Im fearing Buk instead of Sky Sabre because its an easy C&P

I wonder, why not both?
As long as we have them as a sub-tree, we have both rights to have ‘our domestic vehicles’ and ‘vehicles that India operated’

Look at South-African sub-tree, which is doomed on the air side.
We had South Africa as our sub-tree for YEARS, but we only got SAAF JAS39C as the aircraft of the subtree.
(This discussion was originally focused more on air.)
And we also have only three aircrafts from the indian subtree too.
Jaguar IS, HF-24 Marut, and MiG-21Bison.

We legitimately granted the rights to have indian vehicles by Gaijin. We should’ve had planes which we exported to India already.
SHAR FRS.51 or Folland Gnat as an example.

But, I also agree about this part from the deepest part of my heart.