BRUH WHY?
For what purpose?
If this is an early april fool’s joke, I’m not laughing.
yeah i have kinda given up on the navel game mode and have excepted that it is kinda dead
Devs literally don’t play naval. I refuse to believe they do.
If they do they only play Soyuz and thing its fine.
@ParryACO-psn @Libarate Possibility is that because it dies hard, K/D ratio has given high.
Also, for 7.3 it is very hard to kill Vanguard.
Yes Iowa/South Dakota and Soyuz are problem now, so it’s sad that it doesn’t include nerfing them to 9.0 or 8.7, but maybe it would be very hard to evade Vanguard to 8.3
2 Likes
Could perhaps be solved by adding supercharges to the guns. The powder cases would be heavier and more densely packed but still lighter than the actual projectile, but overall dimensions remain the same and the guns and breaches are identical on the ships as to the coastal mountings.
AA firepower mainly, and the removal of the Float plane launcher and such.
Id really like to see a late war Duke of York.
She by this point had a half American AA layout, with a bunch of quad Bofors mounts around her superstructure, to back up the 8 barrel Pom Pom mounts.
She’s also the Queen of the North, MOST of her service was spent in the North sea, Hunting German raiders, which is how she sunk Scharnhorst.
Id love to see her get a custom model covered in icicles and such, just for fun.
5 Likes
Did you say £80 premium?
Honestly, if it went on sale for $60 occasionally? Maybe.
Also, question, how would you feel about the Early draft KGV’s coming to the game? The ones with the 9, 15in guns?
Those later mark 15in guns that never got a use on a Battleship were absolutely brutal, and id love to see them in a game where they don’t get shafted by garbage “Short fuses” (Looking at you World of Warships)
Id like to see them personally, along with the Lions, i think they would be a good stepping stone from the Vanguard to the Lion.
1 Like
It’s a problem with a lot of ships. Gaijin is completely inconsistent with ship drafts. If it’s a Soviet ship, it will be practically underwater, but anything else might as well be filled with ping pong balls.
4 Likes
So that is historically accurate then :P
7 Likes
Or you have Something like HMS renown, where she is legit sitting way low in the water, meaning her main belt armor is basically useless.
1 Like
This is why Gaijin should standardise draught at the vessel’s standard displacement, as both too high and too low of a draught come with big penalties, either exposing the magazine if too high, or by bypassing the scheme entirely if too low.
keeping all vessels at a standard displacement allows for all vessels to get their ideal protection and evens out the playing field between ships, as they are all at their best.
3 Likes
Also Riley, did you ever mull making a “modern ship TT” ?
dam still no R class
1 Like
Still no County Class Destroyer. I want a British Bluewater ship that has missiles. Russia, US and Germany have one now.
4 Likes
It seems Vanguard and Prince of Wales excluded among the list of anti-torpedo protection not implemented along with Bismarck while almost all other battleships(even including British itself) gets anti-torpedo bulge as module in x-ray.
I’ll show HMS Rodney as comparison.
This is shame as KGV class and Vanguard were one of most well protected against torpedo in real life.
3 Likes
What did they change exactly?