Main and Lower Fire control with direct spotting for 2rpm would make the most logical sense. And would be a fantastic buff.
2 Likes
With that fire rate the Rodney might actually be able to challenge the Sharnhorst
It’s kind of interesting and sad that this thread is the only thread that continuously talking about one naval tree. There are none about other nation except Japan (I’m surprised that there are none about US Navy), and even Japan naval thread is much silent than here.
So back to the Rodney, I’m sad that this week’s update is full about BR change, though I can accept it as BR change is indeed quite a big change that can be prioritize before one ship. Just wish they fix reload inside this month before Dev server.
And will be more happy if in March update there are HMS Nelson(1944).
3 Likes
there was kind of a french one but that was only about 1 ship and it not being correctly modeld not the whole tree.
Im guessing a Revenge-Class as its an easy C&P.
Im doubting we’ll see Nelson so soon after Rodney and will more than likely be an Event or Premium not on the TT.
1 Like
well i hope that duke of york and howe are in there late war refits just for the funny amounts of AA they have.
well i am going to say a TT QE class would be nice they could also do it as cape matapan took place in march so they could add a QE and a 15inch boat for italians
Yeah, thats a reasonably good possibility. HMS Warspite/Queen Elizabeth. HMS Royal Oak or HMS Duke of York. Any are possible, I suspect Royal Oak purely because soviets got Royal Soveriegn last update and they’ll want to correct that ASAP.
Im also suspecting (and also hoping) that we wont get back to back BBs after that though, and maybe we’ll see some top tier coastal, cold war destroyer or a new cruiser. I also reckon a Premium HMS Exeter is due at some point.
oo that is somthing i would like is a tech tree version of HMS tiger as i dont want to spend the money to get her but she looks so cool and there are later versions of the ship with diffrent weapons but they said they were going to hold of on adding more missiles to navel but would be cool if you got a lauchable helicopter instead of a float plane
2 Likes
I was hoping for something more like
HMS Hampshire County-Class Destroyer
2x Twin 4.5 Inch guns
2x 20m Cannon
1x Seaslug
2x Seacat
2x Triple Torpedo tubes.
1x Wessex.
Would make such a fun ship
the common weath has some really cool coastal/modern destoryers that would be cool to add
we all love top tier navel
1 Like
It’s funny that she still has WW1 AP. It’s only due to messed shell velocity that those AP has higher penetration than CPC XD.
I once thought Arkhangelsk will be the first British-made 15’’ battleship with 6crh APC as she would be the only backup of Sovetsky Soyuz in the future. But Gaijin is more ignorant in naval than I think.
1 Like
If they add subs and carriers I think naval could come back. They could hold onto it if they reworked the gamemodes
Where Britain herself has so many missing. It would be good for now if we didnt delay many of them further.
Hey morvan can you explain how reasearch effieciency works
I jsut get this feeling Gaijin Fears making the Royal navy too good. They can dismiss us in ground, they can dismiss in air (at least up until Typhoon) but when it comes to naval, they just have no excuse. I cant help feeling at times that Britain is intentionally held back just to maintain not balance, but almost the lead of the other nations. Its really wierd
1 Like
I’m even currently out of top tier naval as it’s too long for Scharn has throne, and while I’m also being the Scharnhorst player who free-aced it, it’s now boring to play it. And Rodney’s fix is still WIP and I don’t want to play it till fixed.
And I have to grind Italian and French coastal this year as I think 2026 it will be coastal that Gaijin will focus. I’m almost done with Italian, only Ghibli left to grind, but I’m frustrated to grind French coastal tree even though I have premium VLT-1.
1 Like
If you try and research a vehicle that is too high or low compared to your own, then you loose a chunk of the RP gained. You can see what the range is on the stat card. Off the top of my head. its +/- 1 Rank.
So If you try to research a Rank 7 with a rank 6, its fine, you’ll get the full reward. But if you try to research a Rank 8 with that rank 6, you’ll get reduced RP. This works in the opposite direction as well, So if you try to research a Rank 5 with than Rank 6, you’ll be fine, but a rank 4 will get reduced RP.
Premiums have a unique bonus where they are dont lose effeciency when research vehicles below their rank, but are still limited to only 1 rank above.
well weirdly dispite it saying 100% for +1/-1 it is actualy 90% for tech tree vehicals to do so
Is it? Damn, I hate research effeciency even more now :D