Did they even know about the warrior ADATS? Because if they did why even bother with the M113 if they already had the warrior model and ADATS turret model.
As I’ve stated many times before it would be great if the ADATS got individual reloadable missile tubes. There’s some other stuff too like depression and fire on the move but idk if it really had it :/
Just like GJ initially had reservations of giving the Italians their leased F-16ADFs while they waited and still wait for the Eurofighter, I do not see why the UK cannot utilize the Legacy Hornet (CF-18) while they wait for their Typhoon as well.
Likewise Britain could have gotten the New Zealand F-16s that were canceled at the last possible moment. Would be more historically accurate than the F-16AJ that they invented for the Japanese TT
Totally forgot about New Zealand. Hell, the UK legit had Mirages with sraams capability too no? GJ be with the BS.
Well brother to be fair, it was not a total invention like the IRST, guessed where countermeasures go imaginary serial production Yak-141 we have in game… The AJ does exist on brochure technically and the 4x Sparrow was tested (2x on the fuselage landing covers) specifically for the Japanese iirc.
We got to be a little fair to GJ regarding the AJ.
Yes that is a two-seater flanker which can be a later model or even a Chinese one for all we know.
Gripen all day.
The Hornet… Now that you brought up the picture does not seem like a legacy Hornet after all… Its canopy is too long and I see two canopy bows. Additionally it has larger leading edge root extensions.
That might be a Super Hornet…
Australian Super Hornet for the UK @Morvran perhaps?! Forget the legacy.
They said that last year same decorator went out and had the Mig29 on it though brother. December 9th, we get the Fulcrum devblog. We are creatures of habit and so are the developers.
Shoot we got nothing better to do for the next 20 days, WT suspense for their biggest patch and most important sales quarter of the year is just clean fun.