Bruh my SKYFLASH’s just do not work… Like they’re missing easy shots and veering off to one side for no apparent reason, just me or anyone else having that?
I’ve had a few “I could have sworn that should have hit” moments, but in SB its nearly impossible to actually see what they are doing most of the time and replay just causes me to CTD
1 Like
One veered off right in a headon, the other missed a Mig-29 who literally made no attempt to evade me and I aimed it right at him as if I was using the gun, in headon mode, and it literally just didn’t fuse or anything.
I’m so close to the Gripen like 70k RP its driving me insane because thats only 7 good games, but 6 boosters later and I have 2 kills.
Yeah. they need to get the heavy duty polish and do some work on the Skyflashes. Something is defo not right
I’ve heard its happened with other sparrows but I don’t have any other versions and I refuse to even touch the 7E-2’s to test it.
Nor do I ,except those on the FGR2. but I wouldnt be surprised if they were all doing wierd things. Radars just feel… dodgy at the moment. I submitted a bug report for the Tornado F3 the otehr day, its doing wierd stuff for me
1 Like
Yeah radars seem strange, I think after I get the Gripen even after I just finish researching it I will go back to gun-fighters for some fun-factor. Things like the Swift and G.91 etc.
If only my favourites were in-game like the Gnat and Type 545 (or not over-br’d Spit MK.24 says hi).
Still it looks like we won’t be going too much more advanced this year so hopefully we can see some more older aircraft.
Yeah, maybe. Im still hoping for something like the FA2 or Gr4 this year.
But I do need to go make an effort to learn how to fly SB without SAS mode (i know what I need to do first, and thats to create a different joystick profiles for it and stuff) but Im just being lazy at the moment. For now, just enjoying the Gr1 being 11.3 and not 12.3
I think the FA.2 is likely, that and an improved F.3.
There’s way too much with sim for my controller using self. That plus every time I use the cockpit view I crash, no idea why but my depth perception just seems to switch off.
Yeah, almost guarantee it.
Unless they decide that the Blue Vixen is too OP or something and we just get some C&P thing instead,
That is strange :D
Maybe its the FoV, it is a little wierd I find at times.
Yeah, you do need a lot of buttosn I find
Aint much else C&P tbf.
Im hoping to see HMS KGV in the near future because unless that Scharnhorst belt starts taking flooding, Scharnhorst has more effective thickness and a higher DPM. Naval seems to be the mode I go for when I want to relax.
Well, an Indian Mig-29 or something, but if they did that, I would get a lot more TKs.
Yeah that would be awesome, we need a proper “modern” BB. and with the washington naval treaty limitations, I dont think it would be all that OP. though I do fear Gaijin modeling the guns jamming ;D
Yeah, naval is usually my chill mode, I wish Naval EC was up all the time. Either that or bombing in the Buc S2 That is also quite relaxing
1 Like
We could do with a 7.0 BB, not really sure why they added a 6.7 particularly what is effectively a C&P one. But regardless, a ship is a ship, I had complained we had too few BB’s and we got one.
A QE or R class would be good. But yeah KGV too would be good although I suspect with the effective thickness it would be pretty hard to kill anywhere but point blank.
1 Like
I’m convinced my PD HDN is going for chaff.
Probably is
So like Scharnhorst then :D
Something about how the missile veers off to the side is exactly like when you get chaff’d.
540mm effective thickness at most on the belt of a KGV vs Scharnhorst 1000mm in some places
Sounds like it then. If you have some clips of it, might be worth asking over in the Tornado thread, get some stuff together for a full bug report
Yeah, sounds about right. Though does KGV have HE rounds?