Personally I i would love to see its “replacement” and its “replacement”'s replacement.
So is there any reason tier 2 mods on the Jaguar GR.1A are 20,000 rp…
Like the tier 2 mods are more expensive than the tier 4’s on the Harrier GR.7
(unfortunate)
Another progress update from me and @AVROVULCANXH558, stay tuned as it is approaching completion and may be out Soon™.
Spoiler
psst, there may be an easter egg somewhere
What’s the defiant?
most OP aircraft ever made
A funny thing
Ah the Bolton Paul.
A fighter with only a dorsal turret on its back for weapons.
This is why we need to implement multiplayer bombers into the game then.
Ah yes, me trying to survive 3 fighters attack, while my friend is busy creating indecent shapes with turrets
That’s just normal WT gameplay what are you talking about?
Manuals for lot of British WW2 planes
Australian Avon/ or btitish Sabre with Firestreak (electronics for it are in the pod below the fusulage)
Nice
overall avon sabres would be great. faster than the F-40 and armed with cannons and sidewinders
ah nice wt
didnt allow to embed yt links
Shudders
That thing is responsible for killing off a decent chunk of pre-war professional RAF pilots in the first year of WW2 - trained flyers who would’ve been REALLY handy a few months later in the Battle of Britain. It also used up valuable Merlin engines that would’ve been REALLY useful in a Hurricane or Spitfire.
You occasionally get someone crop up who says ‘oh it wasn’t that bad - they later used it as a night fighter, target tug, etc. It’s got an undeserved reputation, waffle waffle.’ It WAS THAT BAD.
Alas, for all the solid examples of my countrymen’s excellence in the aviation world (Mosquito, Lancaster, Spitfire) we still manage to plop out a winged turd like the Defiant.
Rant Over
(I’m involved with aviation history as part of the day-job - so technically it’s a professional rant…)
For every great aircraft there must be an equally bad aircraft to compensate 😜
Its an Australian CA-27 (A94-922 to be exact) just for some reason was painted in RAF markings for the Evaluations.
We evaluated it for the Brit Tree we are making but unfortunately as it was a RAAF Aircraft and seems to have had its ADENS removed for testing we decided it wasn’t a feasible addition.
The same aircraft some time in the 90s
also a British Pathe Video on it
Have just realised the Hunter F.6 is 9.7 with 4 SRAAM’s meanwhile the YAK-38 is 9.3 and has 4 R-60’s and is faster with overall better manoeuvrability.
Should I be morally outraged or is there a reasonable explanation for that? What do you all think?