How useful is ground radars in the game? Does anyone actually use them? Because yeah, its a missing feature, but is nothing to cry about honestly.
It was made with informations available at the time, Gunjob said they are looking into it, just gotta wait.
Can’t really compare ASRAAM to those anyways.
Sadly
Not even a mechanic in the game and it would require a lot of work so it doesn’t explode players pcs with so many explosions.
yep, but its not like it is intended
BVM players lost the ability to sympathize, all they could do is press W steam roll everyone
Gaijin uses the same calc for all shells, cry louder when 2 piece ammunition and “muh rifled barrel” backfire. Bug report the ammo location if you can prove it.
Gaijin hasnt implemented the 600chaff because asymmetrical CM carriage isnt implemented, this has been addressed.
If it is missing an implemented weapon either you are lying or there is insufficient proof. Ground radar works much differently than how you perceive, rarely exhibiting the information clarity seen on modern helis or AESA.
AIM-9M/R-73 were both necessary steps forward for top tier, AMRAAM/ARH is coming in the next patch, no need to cry. ASRAAM implements an IRCCM currently not represented in game (imaging seeker) which according to publicly available records exceeds 95% flare rejection. With how gimped IRCCM is no one is ready for this, as the AIM-9X, IRIS-T, and other advanced IRAAMs are near certain kills within WEZ.
Both of the listed bug reports were approved within the last 6mo, and are likely to be implemented.
Your last paragraph show how truly little your understand in the evolution of air combat and the complete over-match even single system change can result in.
Famous for its great protection against HEAT projectiles maybe, but comically bad against kinetic penetrators.
but redtop bug reports already approved for many years, still not fixed
why can think it can be fixed quickly ？
I think with both EF2000 and F18 denied we’re probably looking at a South African gripen
Comically are you trying to anger people
Perhaps, but If top tier aircraft that did not need IRCCM missiles to be highly competitive can get added without any second thought, but we cant even ask for good missiles on much older and weaker airframes. Its kinda BS. Early ASRAAM intergration on F3 would mitigate a LOT of the ASRAAMs later strength, because it was at best a bodge job initially. Would just be longer ranged version of the Aim-9M essentially
Seperating CMs has been a requested feature for years. Entering the Tornado development they must have seen this coming and we’ve had this now for over a year with no word on any improvements. They could at minimum compromise and just double the CM count, so we have 56 flares and 56 chaff and lock it to mixed CMs loadout. At least give us IRL flare count with some chaff.
Wasn’t it only the lease ones denied though
Both rare prototypes with limited information, as cool as the Type 545 would be Gaijin likely lacked the information to model it properly.
UK MOD: Sure the turret cheeks can have 800mm kinetic protection, even the upper plate can have some. The other 40% of the tanks profile? Meh, WW2 medium tank armor should suffice…
Now your just trying to rage bait get a life
Then do explain the lack of mantlet armor and 70mm LFP…
It would still have long range, incredible maneuverability, unflarable IRCCM, etc. The only thing holding it back would be the lack of HMD. I don’t quite like the idea of throwing overpowered missiles on bad aircraft, it’s a nightmare for balance and doesn’t solve anything really.
Just wrong. In every single way, Bug report has been submitted for this.
Done
Both bug reports on the list you looked at for 10 seconds
See above
They really weren’t IRCCM could have been given to low performance aircraft like the FA2 to maintain balance. But instead they were given to 12.3s which would have been 12.3 without them.
Already been reported. Every single one of those weapons I believe has been reported internally by @Gunjob
They are still a capability missing from the aircraft
Yes, 6 months ago and nothing, not even more than a hint they are being worked on. If that was a bug report for another nation, they’d have been fixed 6 months ago. But both missiles have been buggy for nearly a year (and they knew about it)
There were 7 year old proposals on the old forums complete with blueprints for these aircraft, they were passed for consideration.
These are not hard to model, one is a Hunter F.6 with a pointy nose-cone and Red tops.
The other is admittedly harder but luckily for Gaijin, the Prototypes blueprints are available with the exception of the nose cone as multiple radars were slated for use.
They nerf everything else Britain has. I really dont see why nerfing the ASRAAM down to just above Aim-9M levels would be all that bad. In the absence of a Gen 4 before the Typhoon, why not add nerfed ASRAAM to a few aircraft. Create balance that way, less mythological than the Yak-141 or F-16AJ
You need quite a bit more than prototype blueprints to model something in game.
They have been… All of them… We have been waiting for some of the CR2 bug fixes for the better part of 2 years.
Do you have a single inkling of what IRCCM is? What its intended to do? And the massive advancement/evolutions of development it has gone through?
Do you know what you are asking for?