Br compression poll

Machinery of War Discussion
,
1

13.0 SU-33 should not be fighting 12.0 F4J
JAGTIGER 6.7 should not fighting JUMBO SHERMAN 5.7
F14B 13.0 VS 14.0 Rafale
T26E5 6.7 vs 5.7 tiger H1
ETC we need decompression its ruining many fun BRs
we need decompression now

  • YES decompress TopTier by at least 2 BR
  • NO we should keep same
  • other explain below
0 voters
1 Like
2

All of those vehicles besides rafale because its top tier get clubed themselves when they get full uptiered too, and the vehicles you posted club in full downtiers against whatever.

Gaijin knows players arent happy with compression, but decided that they would be even more unhappy with minute+ long que times.

1 Like
3

So either Jagdtiger goes to 7.0 or Jumbo 75 goes to 5.3?
Jagdtiger already isn’t that good and the Jumbo would stomp in a full down-tier even more.
This B.R. change wouldn’t help just leave them at their B.R. change it and it will ruin 4.3 and 6.7 Germany bc no 7.0 for Germany.

This is something that is a bit worst but the US 90mm can struggle to pen an angled tiger if the player isn’t that smart and shoots the Cupola or the lower side. The Tiger H1 with Pzgr. can kill the T26E5 by hitting the mantlet even if it doesn’t pen it will sometimes overpressure.

4

It’s “Jagdtiger” not “Jagtiger”.

5

This is BR 2.7 compression.
2.7 is preventing 3.7s from being separated from 4.7s from 5.7s from 6.7s.
Decompressing 2.7 means you can extend the Jumbo downward in comparison to Jagdtiger as the Jumbo would no longer be facing the under-performing 4.7s, and the “over-performing” 3.7s, 4.7s, and 5.7s would’ve went up with all of the 6.7s. Decompressing 2.7… which impacts all BRs from 1.7 - 6.7.

It’s amazing how many BRs 1 BR of compression impacts.

6

We are all aware that gaijin doesn’t give a **** about BR compression since it is by design. But our only hope is to keep complaining or review bomb/stop buying their products

7

First off, this is probably going to be closed because “erm actually someone made a decompression post 2 years ago and you should go use that even though it’s now an unrelated shouting match hundreds of replies long”

Second you’d really benefit from a more concrete proposal than just “increase by 2 BR”. Where are you intending to slide additional BR slices? What vehicles need moved? And why? Two examples you’re not happy about and a vague call to action are just not enough to work with effectively.

So, for example, looking at the most compressed rank of aircraft (VII), there could be something like this:

1 Like
8

Yes, the Jumbo should go back down to the BR where it was balanced.

9

Not only is the Python 3 very much not ahistorical, but Israel never even used the AIM-9M.

10

Just make the uptier/downtier difference only able to be 0.7

11