Both VT-4s have their battle ratings too high and should be lowered

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
,
41

VT4A1 is probably at 12.0 because it has APS. Much like the Black Night is only at 12.0 because of APS

VT4 looks pretty typical for a 11.7 tank, though the problem as always is compression, with tanks like the Leopard 2A7 and M1A2 SEPv2 needing to be a higher BR

43

All 11.7s just pale in comparison to the M1A2/HC/CB/AIM, its honestly insane how they’re 11.7 when they are functionally identical to the 12.0 SEP.
VT4 could easily be 11.7.

44

Yep, agreed. They just need to move the top tanks to 13.0 and then spread the rest out appropriately between 11.7 and 12.7. Ideally moving most of the premiums up to 12.0 so that 10.7 doesnt face uptier spam.

3 Likes
45

Indeed marginal.
~600mm angled pen is still good.

46

I don’t get how gaijin acts like it is impossible to upgrade the autoloader when they regularly pull reload times out of their asses

1 Like
47

Chines tech players are just to good. No need for buff!
Why got this post hidden??? Nothing inapproprit in here

48

It seems that APS affected vehicles’ battle ratings too much. For example, the T-72B3A is higher than the T-72B3 UBH just because it has Arena APS.
VT-4 is not good at 11.7, since its armour is too bad for this br, and its firepower is just like T-72B3.

1 Like
49

agreed!

1 Like
50

In return T90M gets:

Much better armor protection

Spall Liners

External fuel tanks

Better Shell

LWS

CITV

Blowout Panels for extra shells on turret

Better Gun handling.

Both has pros and cons but in practice i’ll take T90M over T80U anyday, only T80’s that are worthy for top tier are BVM and UE-1 (even UE suffers from absymal elevation speed).

51

True.