He clearly does seeing as he has more than one nation played? xD that’s
The Vehicles he doesn’t understand being what? the abrams being mismodelled or the BMPT terminator which is hilariously OP and miss modelled in game as well>?
He’s already chimed in about the topic.
Should take your own advice a bit more often son.
Ah nothing about your stats are important? but his are?
I mean he already stated and is extremely honest as to why his stats are poor.
Your reason of “Im a prem player” is pathetic, I use prems and I aint rocking a damn 62 percent overall score and barely 900 score a match stats.
ah right, I see what your game is.
“Don’t challange me cause I decided to try ridicule someone elses stats then state they need to have great stats” will rocking garbage stats of your own.
There was and is no reason for you to have done what you did. Hence why I pulled it up. The BMPT terminator is OP for it’s BR. Not up for debate that.
You attacked @SwingfireOP stats for absolutely no reason purely due to him stating something you disagreed with, and when I do the same suddenly it’s not okay yeah nah not how it works buddy.
Dae ye aye? what history is that then? lol
1 Like
The downsides were it was able to be killed with stuff like a .50 cal, now adays though it doesn’t and it survives a decent chunk of stuff hurled at it for how little armour etc it has.
I mean survives a lot for a tank which is meant to be fragile af, not that it’s comparable to a heavy tank etc.
However it has a stupidely good set of offence which can shred multiple enemy targets extremely quickly, that is with poor positioning as well.
T62 UFP can be penned with the APDS from most of the 8.0 & 8.3 MBTs.
1 Like
Lmao with what ? Remember that prior to the message that I stated he only played one nation. It was purely about the BMPT. Then tell me , what did I disagree with him ? Tell me what have you contributed to this thread beside keep mentioning stats over and over again ? Nothing.
And please , no more wall of text. I am def not reading all that. BMPT should move up or get it armored change, what else are there to be talked about ? It got it fair share of downside but the armor making up way too much and the inconsistency in it damage model.
If I talk about any vehicle I will be neutral but for a person whom only play Brit ground he making a lot of questionable statement. If you can’t keep your own personal/confirmation bised why talking ?
Bro why are you on the forums if you’re not gonna read LMAO.
I agree, we already discussed almost everything there is to be said in this thread. It’s getting repetitive. People need to scroll up and just READ.
I read but he sent like part of bible bro. Like sure , I respect when people actually making an effort to take my point apart and respond to it. But he sent 3 paragraph that contain " You are worse than me , meaning you are wrong and biased i win bye bye". Like ok sure but if I am wrong about BMPT/T-62/Turm III , all being mentioned in this very thread I will accept it. Not whatever he sending , I have been wrong and I believe I will continue to do so in the future but I will take the L when it is actually an L.
Not three paragraph without a single mention of the vehicle mentioned in the thread name or the vehicle in the convo.
It’s not that you won’t read it, it’s that you genuinely can’t.
Look I would reply to you with something proper but look at how you’ve interacted with him and others about it .,shows how genuinely childish you are.
You cannot read small sentences or short paragraphs then why are you on a forum for discussing
or do you only want to discuss what you want to hear?
who* not whom here.
He plays more than britain dudes 4th most used vehicle is a T72AV turms brother.
Cause he can’t lol. im an English teacher mate and the “im not reading all that” comes from a lack of reading comprehension.
3 Likes
That is not part of a bible at all.
You need to learn to read more if you think a mere 2 or 3 sentences is a lot
1 Like
So… Any of this relate to warthunder or BMPT ? Or turm III or the T-62 ? I meant Engirks not my first languege so sorry Techer. I will try my best to correct myself before sending something online !
None of this would have happened if people stop getting off topic on different vehicles. Go complain on the respective threads. And stop pointing at each other stats. I don’t care if you’re a good player or not. And stop attacking each other. Can we focus on BMPT, I can’t believe I look at this thread and waste my time seeing stupid comments from yall.
3 Likes
But still An Pegion is a teacher so Idk. Maybe that got something to do with BMPT.
Electronic component may be a little too strong???
Even with a 125mm its hard to aim at the weakspot (I couldnt see his hull), its very trolly at that part because you might hit the ERA on the turret.
Consisder this message a reset on this thread. Every comment below has to be about the BMPT and its placement at 10.3. I don’t want others that need to catch up on what we said read you guys fighting.
already responded about it further up to swingfire.
the BMPT terminator should ge the same dart as the damn BMP2M and go to 11.3 or 11.7 depending onhow it goes armour wise.
It is extremely potent to be at the same BR as the ajax and what not
Have you not seen my other mentions of the damn thing? xD
I also noticed shooting the electronic module in the turret doesn’t stop the guns from firing.
1 Like
Don’t think the driver hatch is a weakspot and you missed the weakspot on the last pic by some pixel I assume and your side shot did nothing because of course lol. The thing is mostly empty there
I noticed that the other day by the way, I fired a DM23 clean through it and it did break itbut the dude kept on firing.
Right now, the ammo is hard to hit to kill the BMPT. It should be shooting the turret but not the ammo disables the turret completely, like the PUMA. The BMPT will survive but obviously can’t shoot back. Same principle as the other unmanned turret vehicles.
Even if you detonate the missiles in the launchers it doesn’t do much damage at all to the actual tank.
The turrets soak some amont of damage compared to other IFVs as well
We got a bug report response about the ammo belts not killing the tank, they consider the ammo belt that’s highlighted as external so it won’t destroy the vehicle when blown up.
Sure man the ammo belt that goes directly into the hull and connects to the hull ammo is external, such bending of logic to make the BMPT artificially powerful.
This is just disheartening.
7 Likes
Gaijin said in the last patch they “fixed the bug” where detonating the missiles killed the BMPT.
