Someone should go ahead and prove that BMPT or BMPT72’s feeding and stowage systems are compatible with 3UBR11 first.
(gl with that, not even uralvagonzavod lists it as an option for BMPT/BMPT72)
The round is not in production, nor used by the vehicle in combat and its existence beyond a showpiece-/prototype stage more questionable than the decision to put the bmpts at 10.3.
Besides, they literally started production of a new AP-T round (3UBR10) to replace the old AP-T (3UBR6) with, instead of going for increasing the production of 3UBR8 (which is also rarely ever used) or starting production of 3UBR11.
no it wasn’t, I saw them shooting with destroyed guns, shooting after being ammo racked, I saw one or two shooting for a few seconds after dying (not joking, but that may have been an animation bug), hit them in the back of the turret with 155mm HE and done zero damage. The only reason the BMPT is worse is its also premium and there is FAR more of them.
Gaijin decides br based on data. There is no democracy here. And the newbies buying the BMPT-72 isn’t helping as it balances the veteran players’ stats.
This is accounted for. Worse players playing BMPT will perform better in an OP BMPT than other vehicles they play, thus causing statistical anomaly proving its OP status.
russian tanks in the game are mainly feared due to the ERA they have, yes china also has ERA but have larger tanks, russian tanks are quite small and have ERA blocks everywhere
and the reload buff (T80BVM or any other T80 series) also gives them an edge since most players dont have an experted or aced crew
i know i play t80 what im saying is that with the better apfsds they would perform similar to how china currently performs china also used the MZ and AZ auto loaders and have similar hull and turret architecture