i lied
Hey, Type 90 isn’t T-series.
@Lambda_Delta
GHPC said they’re never going to implement realistic controls for tanks.
After that, I ignored the game on Steam cause they prefer arcadey clunky controls over being compared to War Thunder.
GHPC never wants to be as realistic as War Thunder, and that’s their self-admitted priority.
Gaijin publishing is not Gaijin Entertainment the developer that only works on one game.
DCS is also getting left behind in air compared to War Thunder. Especially since DCS is an unoptimized mess not made for non-HDDs.
I like that Gaijin is impartial. Despite their self-admitted love of Sweden, they screw up predictably and for all tech trees when something entirely new is added.
After all, T-58 is OP and still hasn’t budged. M10 Booker is 1.0 BRs below its equals, and hasn’t budged.
About 20 - 30 OP vehicles in the game, and people focus on the one Soviet one.
3 Likes
that what i meant by skiping side ERA, also bais / blind ussr players. ( dont mind all these shoot, just trying something new )
this is just stupid, DM63 just vanished
1 Like
top 2 are from ukraine
Yeah I know, but where else are ukraine vehicles gonna go. Was part of the soviet union.
Ngl this one could be more balanced than what we have in game rn. Weaker chassis without trolly side era (not k5 or relict at least).
Also imagine seeing this one in sim and mistaking it for bmp2. And thanks to gaijin crew will always scream “bmp” or “pc”
1 Like
The round bounced off the roof armor after penning the ERA + shroud, causing it to partial pen the side.
if you look into the Puma bug reports you can see that basicly 2/3 of the actual frontal armor is missing from the Puma
1 Like
Yeah armor and spikes. It’s been half baked ever since release. I look and see how much fun people have with the BMPT. While they shrug off everything thrown at them. At least I can cookoff my belt ammo with them. sigh
same goes for the Boxer too honestly but yea the BMPTs rly rly showed how shafted the Puma is even to those who didnt want to believe it
The only Bradley that would easily end up getting the same treatment as the AGS (Expeditionary tank) is the LOSAT one with a pop-up turret. Unless the army shadow drops a brand new M3E4 or something with JAGM and a high RoF 30mm or 50mm.
1 Like
I don’t think Gaijin is that keen on adding it to the USSR as it would probably cause an uproar because of certain historical events currently happening
They probably would have snuck it in there with the Oplot they added to Japan if they really wanted too
If they do plan to add it, it would probably be years after the lil history moment ends, so they are either going to avoid it for a long time or find a work around
3 Likes
yeah on russian vehicles spall liner works but on single german vehicle wich have spall liner afther is penetrate spall liner spalling what sense have this? look at thoose spalling… i reported this 4 monts ago samw with spike… go gaijin no react…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/t50F4US3cDDn
1 Like
so turret basket create spall but russian autoloade no… autoloader protect ammo from spall damage woow…
2 Likes
Yep that’s how it is right now.
The feet dragging on this issue by gaijin is unacceptable.
2 Likes
yeah its the T-15 and with how stupid the BMPT currently is should never be added below 12.7
something I find really funny if gaijin refusing to add the PSO warkit for the Ajax as a modification, literally would be less cancer then the BMPT as it doesn’t up armour the turret only the hull
1 Like