BMPT/72 Should not be 10.3

Massively artificially nerfed. Should be able to reach 20km when dropped at 500 ft (2 year old report for that ) can barely hit 8km under those current conditions. So slow that they are ALWAYS intercepted. I consider them a total waste of SP, you are better off gun strafing.

Limited number, quite slow, but I suppose does count.

KH-59, KH-38 and AASM ive already said.

glide bombs… kinda not the same as long ranged AGMs, given they need both speed and height to do that .

It does when its not modeled. Not even close.

its like saying the Harrier GR7 should be balanced around having its EW suite that isnt even modeled in game. Its a stupid argument.

Pantsir should have never been added when it was, or equals should ahve been added within 3 months not 3 years,

It always prevented Aim-9L/Ms

meanwhile 2 year old reports for most NATO MBTs…

2 Likes

To be honest, half of those are slow enough to be countered. I don’t actually know all of them but glide bombs sure are not the longest ranged unless we only count what the stats say. In performance the KHs still win due to their massive warhead or whatever making it hard to dodge it competely. And due to their speed SPAAs have a harder time with them. Anyways, if we’re looking at the stats alone yeah I guess those are long ranged.

1 Like

Spike is worse at longer ranges for some reason.
It’s… weird.

@Morvran
Yeah, you need altitude to get max range out of all of these.
You’re not getting 70km out of KH-38 without being up high.

@shacortes-psn
Well, all of them are slow enough to be countered in ground.
There’s a reason the meta now is GNSS and close range surprise tactics.

No one’s launching any of these from long range in ground, let alone with success.

yes the su 25t is defended against them tf are you on

@Zahltag
Yes, at long range… glad we’re in agreement.

not just

At close range it’s only really effective against R-60s and similarly week seeker missiles, close range is advised for IR missiles against non-afterburning targets.
But this topic is about BMPT needing to be a higher BR.

as usual you brought it up. As usual you lie.

1 Like

Yeah uhhh my Spyder doesn’t do that :) even when thrown from 15km.

There’s a reason I’ve been calling Spyder 12.0 equivalent for a bit.

Awww, I guess I haven’t got much to say then.

1 Like

Oh God, forbid Russia having one decent top MBT.

God forbid a single soviet vehicle being balanced. After the recent buffs, half of them are notably under BRed

5 Likes

Also just too many additions and buffs in a rather short time frame (for WT…).

KH-38, LMUR, Soyuz, Flanker, R77-1, BMPT, caroussel reload buff, really good event reward (Foxbat ^^), naval missile age, super special BUK complex, DIRCM.

They should really make break. Whats next? MIR space station with laser lances for orbital strikes?

2 Likes

Im guessing they’ll get the best ARMs, their radars will be immune to our ARMs and they’ll be the first to get MMW

Yep. I glad t series became more balanced than it was before

1 Like

Hopefully they’ll all get BR increases

Wonderful TANDEM warhead doing TANDEM things :)

ah comrade, they aren’t missing, they are simply “optional”, no need to add them, yes
(they’ll add them in the future as a different vehicle that you need to research)

2 Likes

7 Likes