BMPT/72 Should not be 10.3

Those who defend BMPT can be described with the following sentence:

  • This person will be in the bathtub at home or under the shower taking a bath while the house is on fire.

They are simply the typical player who would accept breaking the game completely by being able to eliminate an entire BR of nations within the game out of pure selfishness and a desire to gain an advantage.

Remember that because of players like this, games have been completely abandoned because they had so many transactions that gave immense benefits and conditions for victory to those who bought them. And WT is not heading in a different direction if they don’t increase the BR of this god damn vehicle.

7 Likes

It was stupidly overpowered and only got overshadowed by the M1 being even more stupidly overpowered.

You can have the opinion that both the BMPT and Leopard 2K/Puma broke their BRs, you don’t have to shield either of these.

2 Likes

I‘m not, but the bmpt is FAR WORSE.

I never said no other vehicles strongly overperformed, but no others did so as hard and as blatantly

putting the blame on the player instead of the devs is just dumb.

but hey while your complaining
image

If you can be mediocre with a vehicle that is giving nukes to beginners, it doesn’t mean that the vehicle is OK. It just means other things, but I ask you to contact the aliens to find out what it means.

I wish I were this oblivious.

I find it rather funny that some people try to argue about X thing not being OP/being powerful, yet using it themselves. I assume it is just an attempt to keep said thing at a lower BR/keep its its performance. Oh well, seen it more than enough times to the point I have lost count

Anyway; yea I agree it should be higher in BR at the very least

12 Likes

Its very weak it should go down in BR it needs to go to 9.7 ASAP

i am aware of the problem, if you have read what is said multiples times, you should know.

never said the this is good at this br, said many times, even in my own forum when the dev was open, its suppose to be 11.0/11.3. i am still asking you where did i said that the thing is supose to be at 10.3.

but hey you still cant read or have a proper talk. instead you just threw few word here and there with no use of brain.

It has less pen than m4 sherman, 2.7 please gaijin

Also this would be a great time to look back at this report. It’s been 9 months since it was accepted, why hasn’t it been acted on? Tandem HEAT charges have been broken and helping tanks like BMP-T to be more survivable than they should. Come on.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Zfsqtmx0m0K4

5 Likes

because only nation that is benefiting from this bug is? guess? RUSSIA! YAY what a surprise

1 Like

When the problem negatively affects Russia, it is fixed in practically two days.

When the problem negatively affects any other nation in combat against Russian vehicles, they will only fix it in 70 years.

1 Like

As much as I might agree with the listed vehicles, none of them really affected uptier that much

Any of the listed vehicles are/were nullified in uptiers and eventually became nerfed by raising their BR (and some of them might still be waiting for that).

Pushing BMPT to higher BR inherently does next to nothing to fix its problems.

1 Like

that was my point from the start, all thing added will be op in the update drop.
then nerfed to death after.

I mean, it does mean that now 9.7 vehicles (of which there are a “above zero” number of) would not have to face the BMP-T. Having played a handful of games at that BR (mostly as a UK AA lineup with the OSA and Stormer AD to have “fun”) it is an actual horror show trying to not accidentally get double tapped by 30mm fire, and it was bad enough before trying to run away from the hordes of T-series tanks.

While I agree that fundamentally another BR bump is a bandaid to a solution that requires an ICU and lifesaving surgery, it is better than the current state of affairs which is that “it’s miserable to be playing anything that isn’t Russia”

we said this about the Pantsir… it got maybe one or two BR bumps but as per, it was a bit (very) unfair on practically every other lineup, which didn’t have comparable AA. Russian teams essentially got a free pass from enemy CAS provided their Pantsir player had two functioning synapses, whereas basically everyone else was busy still trying to flank-speed manouevre out of the way of the Kh-38MT…

but as i said, pushing BMPT to higher BR does not inherently fix its issues.

sure, but moving the BMPT up only changes the matchup it faces, but the issues still remain.

Its crewless turret will work the same no matter if shot by Leopard 2A4 or 2A7V.

Its UFP wont be penned by either DM23 or DM53 (not in garage rn so i cant check, dont lynch me).

Im keen on the most recent “fix”, but I have yet to go back to playing anything that isnt russia 10.3 lol.

1 Like

well it matters A LOT because 2A4 cannot pen its sides or front reliably…

Made another report on the belts, this time with the video as additional reference.
Probably gonna get shut down with no reason given again because they really dont like when people disprove their blatant lies it seems.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1vaXx9PreDA9

For the pantsir s1 i kinda understand why they decided to add it.

At the time of the pantsir time, cas was dominated by nato side. when so called ussr was stuck with su22 and mig27.

is fire & forget terms, nato was with 6 agm65 plys tv gbu
while red team had only 2 kh29 and good kh25.

i might be wrong, i was not a player back then