Yeah, hell with balance as long as nato supremacy is there.
And btw i remember threads like “RUSSIA IS STOMPING NATO” lmao. Because they couldn’t comprehend a nation being better than nato
The larger warhead means that even in MP, it can do damage. Had one earlier nearly take me out whilst i was flying low in MP deploying chaff.
Others like the say the Sky Sabre, just dont have the explosive mass to do any damage.
Reddit/Youtube boosts sales, these threads are nothing but negative and just rather smaller portion of the community. I can bet you the guys busting out the wallet arent looking at these threads/forum pages. Most of the community thinks ill wise of the dudes on forums
1 Like
Unless its soviet ERA you are firing at, that is more than enough to oneshot most top tier MBTs
and isnt there a better ATGM available? Stick it at 12.0/12.3 and give it that
However you form those opinion based on incomplete and possibly data and likely many faulty assumptions.
So it’s not like your opinion holds any weight.
It holds greater weight than the people arguing the BMPT should remain at 10.3 “because its fun at this BR”
and the only people defending the BMPT are just wanting the free nukes
The thing is, I haven’t seen necrons defend the BMPT even once. From what I read he only commented on the few nation mains coping that only Russia gets OP vehicles that don’t instantly get nerfed.
Because the soviets do consistantly get OP stuff.
Like still waiting on Soyuz to be nerfed, or 2S38, or KH-38MT or LMURs.
Sure, its not ONLY the soviets, but all 9 of the other nations combined get less OP stuff than the soviets
alone.
I have no doubt that if the BMPT was added to any other nation. It would have been moved up on the dev server and likely nerfed ontop of that. If it had been added at all
1 Like
With 800mm you need to aim in most cases. If you need to aim then missile is bad and overtiered. Yes, this can be сompensated by vehicle’s other weapons/stats, but at the moment, we are only talking about the missile, so we don’t take the rest into account.
Wait what?
The soviets entire argument is that the BMPT is fine because you just have to aim at small targets to kill. But 800mm of pen is bad because you need to aim?
The problem with that is that what is OP is very subjective and based on experience.
2S38 for example was kind of OP on release and because of it got the interior changed. Some people still think it’s OP, other people (like me) think it’s nothing more special to deal with and mostly a free kill now.
Depends on if it was still getting a premium version alongside it. The T58 also hasn’t been moved up because it’s a premium, same reason likely for the BMPT.
4 Likes
and I still see 0 excuse for why the 2S38 is still only 10.3. Especially since the decompression
Because the 2S38 stats are low, mainly caused by a combination of new/bad players and the 2S38 just being very farmable for MBTs.
4 Likes
For missile it’s super bad. This does not necessarily make the vehicles bad, as other stats can compensate for this.
2S38 much like other lightly armored autocannon vehicles is just incredibly annoying to deal with at times especially if they get the drop on you.
What annoys me specifically about the 2S38 is that while yes it did get new modules that in theory make it eaiser to kill it in practice did nothing but buff it because realistically your still taking the same shots at it you were before. The only difference is now it has some new modules that are largely rng but for the most part dont stop it from dying. In return it lost its 20 round ready rack and just gets access to all 148 rounds with mo down time. Stuff like the PUMA also didnt really get affected by the module changes either but its still just as annoying honestly.
(I personally still hate the 35mm spaa more anyways)
1 Like
Excuse me ? Since when do you need to aim with 800mm of pen ?
Don’t have the context but no apparently Terminator never got better missiles.
Reminder that the T90 version was made in 2000 approximately, the T-72 one for export in 2013, and since it was meant to be a cheaper alternative they just simplified it. The T-15 variant might have mounted different missiles, even though the launcher looks similar.
Eh, it still has an effect. Maybe not a large one but the effect is definitely going to be there, same with the Reddit threads on the issue (of which there are many).
I don’t get why people call this overpowered… Like c’mon it only has 4 missiles that you have to aim when facing an MBT from the front. And having apds going against light tanks at that br is a pain in the ass, mostly because they are immune to apds from the front. Even the sides can sometimes eat up those rounds. Sure the armor is great at that br, but that’s the only thing going for it. Mobility is also bad for what it was made for, gameplay wise.
Would take the BMP-2M over this to be honest.
1 Like
You have an ammo box, the number of missiles is of no concern.