The armor isn’t strange, it’s a T-72B/T-90 hull. The only strange part is the turrets, but as I said those aren’t valid targets if there’s no explody ammo behind the armor anyway.
So that leaves the hull.
You avoid the ERA coverage like you do with T-72B 1989, and you aim for the hull ammo.
Of course, they are still resilient vehicles and warrant going up in BR.
They are not invincible though.
They very much are a shoot hull and only hull vehicle, and people [including myself once] are shooting the turrets.
This is so far the most understandable to me.
I can visualize why these vehicles warrant 10.7 very easily. 11.0’s a little more difficult to visualize, but I can still see it.
Do you know how hard it is to hit that lower plate? What if the tank is spinning or bouncing on bumps? No, hitting the lower plate is not the same as hitting the Abrams’ silhouette. Don’t confuse them.
I shot down at him, and it ricochet’d off his hull floor back up into the ammo.
I’ve been practicing T-series hull shots since 2019.
So while BMPT has been easy for me to learn how to deal with using DM33/3BM42 equivalent and superior rounds, I can see why DM23/13 equivalent rounds would have some difficulties seen as the most popular rounds around 9.3.
bro … it’s ALWAYS the case. Every br has a top dominating invulnerable annoying as hell russian thingy that when played by a mildly competent dude can wreak havoc without even trying
