It’s not possible, everyone know russian tanks are indestructible, that video is a west propaganda !
xD
And ? You can be “gaijined” hitting russian armor. Today - non penetrated lower plate from Sabra, Gal Batash, Merkava Mk 2D.
Nothing happens to side shoot, also from the above tanks.
Armor eating shells from Merkava 2D …
BMPT has buffed armor, even T-90M is a lot easier to kill than BMPT.
And that was funny, this shit has 10.3 BR, get KD 5.0 +, 70-80 % of win rate, and now compare it to any other “tank destroyer” ( another topic, tank destroyer ? xDDDDDDDDD ) or light tank, you can add +10BR and you don’t find better or even same tank like BMPT
Idler wheel, turret ring, lower front plate… Same weakspots people should be use to.
@H_ngma
So I don’t get to have the only opinion, and same exact opinion of BMPT moving up I’ve had on the vehicle for the last couple days? What a weird demand.
Black Night is a higher BR than Challenger 2…
T-80UM2 is a higher BR than T-80UD, it’s also an event vehicle that can easily avoid BR increases [see M60 AMBT].
@gfdsa_killer
People are disabling with cannons first, then after they determined they can’t finish off a tank with the autocannon will they use an ATGM.
Not sure why you’re making a weird take about 2A7.
Also the whataboutism meme is supposed to be “Alright Alvis, since you want BMPT moved up because it has good armor; does that mean you want Leopard 2A7 moved up as well because it has good armor?”
@An_Pigeon
The hull armor array of T-72B - 90M does not change.
And yeah, I’ve been saying Namer armor has been underperforming since dev server.
@StaszekJones
Me having an aiming issue is not me being “Gaijin’d”. I’m not a child that needs to blame others because I aimed poorly.
And T-90M objectively has more armor, that’s just a fact.
BMPT should move up, and you guys can keep arguing all you want, but I won’t change that stance.
I still reckon the BR was decided so that it would 100% be strong, just ahead of Christmas where people may have some disposable income to buy the Premium version.
Hopefully a BR change is early January, but im not holding my breath as they probably will milk the BMPT for a while
So whilst every MBT is aiming for tiny Weakspots (that can only be seen if the tank isnt hull down) the BMPT is just shredding eveything. The typical “jsut aim for the microscopic weakspot, its perfectly balanced” answer.
By that logic, can the CR2 be 10.3 and to kill it you just have to aim for the weakspots? Perfectly balanced
yes you dont get to say that you totally want it to go up after stating that the most obviously undertiered ground vehicle since the release Puma is a “hard guess where it should be” and that you “can see where they were coming from with the BR they introduced this rather unique vehicle at”
its the same BR as the Challenger2E you know the one its foldered with
Same BR as the T80U
So no the T72B3A is not .6 higher because of APS but because of Relict
@H_ngma
T-80U has thermals, and would be a false equivalence fallacy for me to compare it to something without thermals.
Challenger 2E has vastly higher mobility than the Challenger 2 and Black Night.
Also if BMPT was introduced at a similarly OP BR as the Puma, the BMPT would currently be ~9.3.
Puma is 2BRs higher than it use to be, and is currently arguably over-BR’d.
I don’t get why you’re quoting me calling out Gaijin’s mistakes as something bad.
Me calling out Gaijin’s mistakes by empathizing with them, and wanting them to do better is something I won’t feel bad doing.
I also have to know how they made that mistake to better criticize it.
T-72B3 has Relikt as well, and has better ERA coverage than B3A.
If you’re talking UFP, then sure one has K5, but K5 isn’t as different to Relikt as you’re implying.
I never claimed that it is as under BRed as the Puma was just that’s it’s the most blatant under BR since then.
It’s a cashgrab it’s not that deep, no need to emphasize since it’s not a mistake. It’s completely obvious that it’s under BRed but it’s already selling like crazy so Gaijin did everything right from their POV.
It’s a 67% increase in KE protection. That’s an insane step up in armor
@ItsOnyy You didn’t quote any take of mine.
You quoted me repeating what I witnessed.
Witnessing things is not a take.
A take would be me saying “Spikes seem inconsistent based on what you told me and what I witnessed.”
Yeah so…
What exactly is there to say about this atp.
Literally preferential treatment for a singular vehicle, despite it being different on every single other vehicle in the entire game.
This was the initial response on the other report btw (before it was edited)
The new report disproved this utter nonsense claim with primary and secondary sources (“external belts” do not exist. There are two consecutive belts in total, there is no separation otherwise and even then half of these “external” belts are still internal).
Just for reference, here are images from the primary sources;
Even in-game the cutout for the belts/feeding system is modelled, there is literally 0 separation.
Gaijin should actually do something about the BMPT’s… Queue times are too long for 10.3 USSR matches and even if you’ll get into a match you’ll just face terminators, even though you are playing the terminator…
