Yeah so…
What exactly is there to say about this atp.
Literally preferential treatment for a singular vehicle, despite it being different on every single other vehicle in the entire game.
This was the initial response on the other report btw (before it was edited)
The new report disproved this utter nonsense claim with primary and secondary sources (“external belts” do not exist. There are two consecutive belts in total, there is no separation otherwise and even then half of these “external” belts are still internal).
Just for reference, here are images from the primary sources;
Even in-game the cutout for the belts/feeding system is modelled, there is literally 0 separation.
Gaijin should actually do something about the BMPT’s… Queue times are too long for 10.3 USSR matches and even if you’ll get into a match you’ll just face terminators, even though you are playing the terminator…
Oh yes, i love guys who use that “sKiLl iSsUe” arguments :D
If you dont know what to say, say skill issue. It’s look like that.
Namer don’t have underperformed armor. That’s you skill issue when you try to hide it. Change my mind.
Yes, T-90M has more armor. On the paper. Paper will accept everything here, and that also is just a fact.
You dont understand the problem. It’s like “never ending story” when they add new “premium” or “top” tanks / planes. Currently BMPT armor is “bugged” (?) and this is not a “aiming issue” - if you shoot to the same place, 10 times, and all the time the result is different, that’s a aiming issue ? Why this aiming issue doesn’t occur on T-series tank ?
@StaszekJones
I’m here calling for BMPT to be moved up and your post just has nonsense in it.
So me taking responsibility for my flaws is something to be mocked?
Ironic that you’re the only one to have posts claiming “skill issue”.
Are you upset that we want BMPT brought up in BR?
Also no, the T-90M does not have more armor on paper. Statcards under-rate armor and that includes the T-90M. On paper the T-90M has equivalent armor or worse.
In practice, the T-90M has more armor due to a significantly stronger turret and more protected side ERA array.
I’ve been confused by their decision since dev server, but I still haven’t the slightest clue how stop being confused.
I’d comment on it if I wasn’t confused.
Maybe I need to see the inside of a BMPT’s turret?
Cause every bit of conventional knowledge I have is telling me that ammo should be part of the crew compartment.
(yeah my Japan 9.3 is a bit thin) but still, BMPTs, T-80UDs and 2S38s realllllly shouldn’t be getting to face stuff like the Type 16 and Type 74. (in my opinion)
I’m trying to think of ways to justify a BR higher than 10.7, and the 9.7s might convince me, but that could just be the 12.0 decompression needing to impact many to most of the 10.3s - 11.3s now.
Cause I’m starting to think that BMPT is in a compression problem as well as being under-BR’d currently.
