I’ve been finishing spading a few 10.3s whilst doing the event. Maybe I should play 10.7 or 11.7 instead
1 Like
Can’t say about UK 11.7, but my Japan and China 11.7 games were fairly decent, 12.0 at most usually.
Yeah. Thats my usual findings at the moment, but CR2s are a bit meh and 50% of the CAS is broken at the moment
1 Like
I did the first stage with a mix of 8.7 and 10.7 brits was not terrible tried 12.7 was not feeling it but I did unlock the Ajax along the way 8.7 felt better than 10.7 though as there was always the risk of a lurking bmpt stage I’ll probably use Italy
i was playing 10.0 brits and had a lot of fun, clueless paypiggies are so easy
honestly just a blast… until you get matched with americans lmao
If BMPT would have been a german nuke printer, there would have already been an “emergency patch”. We just had it with the Flakpanzer. Glory lasted less than a week and it got a “special patch”.
You’ll see Gajin will just let it butcher its way through all those gen1 and 1+ MBT tanks.
4 Likes
I get more reliable kills with Tow2a than using Spikes. Not speaking about the number…there are just 4 spikes per Puma. Its just one league below the best saclos ATGMs.
…
Why is this such a hard concept for people to grasp?
Which tank is more likely to survive a snapshot? The t-62, because of the thicker armour giving more of a buffer. It turns a marginal shot into a non penetrating shot. Is it good armour? Absolutely not, no armour is good at that br range but it’s still better.
I genuinely don’t get why people think the turm is dramatically under tiered, it’s same mobility as the leopard, armour is about the same effectiveness (ie not at all), same ammunition. It has the 30mm and the 2 second faster reload but that comes at the cost of detonating on any penetration of the turret. It also gains the stabiliser of course.
Could it stand to go to 8.7? I’m sure it would be fine but it just doesn’t feel that bad to me, given the drawbacks of its autoloader. Could the t-62 move down to 8.3? I guess, but the trouble is you then have a gun calibre increase over the t-55a without an increase in br.
As always , the answer is decompression.
Two things i have to say.
-
9.0 is incredibly fun to play atm.
-
I would laugh if in the next BR changes the 2S38 goes up in br but the BMPT stays were it is.
1 Like
Thats just the class player guided vs FnF (aka Gaijin guided) issue. We wouldnt have that problem if Gaijin bothered to properly model top attack agms other than the LMUR
Neither, because you actively have to aim to bounce a shot of the T-62.
A really mobile tank with a quick reload and stabilizer.
Yeah that is actually stupidly strong at 8.3.
Mobility and firepower is an insane combination, especially at that BR.
2 Likes
That’s a bit of hyperbole, is it guaranteed? Christ no but it can be enough to stop some stuff, especially with earlier apds that will richochet or just shatter.
I’m not denying it’s strong, I just think people don’t give the downsides enough credit. Agree to disagree I guess.
SwingfireOP on his way to report stuff he doesn’t like (It is literally 1984)
Strange one could claim this then ignore all the downside of the T-62 and to a certain extend the BMPT. Also ignoring how strong the Turms III is if the player using the thing have more than 1 braincell
2 Likes
He clearly does seeing as he has more than one nation played? xD that’s
The Vehicles he doesn’t understand being what? the abrams being mismodelled or the BMPT terminator which is hilariously OP and miss modelled in game as well>?
He’s already chimed in about the topic.
Should take your own advice a bit more often son.
Ah nothing about your stats are important? but his are?
I mean he already stated and is extremely honest as to why his stats are poor.
Your reason of “Im a prem player” is pathetic, I use prems and I aint rocking a damn 62 percent overall score and barely 900 score a match stats.
ah right, I see what your game is.
“Don’t challange me cause I decided to try ridicule someone elses stats then state they need to have great stats” will rocking garbage stats of your own.
There was and is no reason for you to have done what you did. Hence why I pulled it up. The BMPT terminator is OP for it’s BR. Not up for debate that.
You attacked @SwingfireOP stats for absolutely no reason purely due to him stating something you disagreed with, and when I do the same suddenly it’s not okay yeah nah not how it works buddy.
Dae ye aye? what history is that then? lol
1 Like
The downsides were it was able to be killed with stuff like a .50 cal, now adays though it doesn’t and it survives a decent chunk of stuff hurled at it for how little armour etc it has.
I mean survives a lot for a tank which is meant to be fragile af, not that it’s comparable to a heavy tank etc.
However it has a stupidely good set of offence which can shred multiple enemy targets extremely quickly, that is with poor positioning as well.
T62 UFP can be penned with the APDS from most of the 8.0 & 8.3 MBTs.
1 Like
Lmao with what ? Remember that prior to the message that I stated he only played one nation. It was purely about the BMPT. Then tell me , what did I disagree with him ? Tell me what have you contributed to this thread beside keep mentioning stats over and over again ? Nothing.
And please , no more wall of text. I am def not reading all that. BMPT should move up or get it armored change, what else are there to be talked about ? It got it fair share of downside but the armor making up way too much and the inconsistency in it damage model.
If I talk about any vehicle I will be neutral but for a person whom only play Brit ground he making a lot of questionable statement. If you can’t keep your own personal/confirmation bised why talking ?
Bro why are you on the forums if you’re not gonna read LMAO.
I agree, we already discussed almost everything there is to be said in this thread. It’s getting repetitive. People need to scroll up and just READ.
I read but he sent like part of bible bro. Like sure , I respect when people actually making an effort to take my point apart and respond to it. But he sent 3 paragraph that contain " You are worse than me , meaning you are wrong and biased i win bye bye". Like ok sure but if I am wrong about BMPT/T-62/Turm III , all being mentioned in this very thread I will accept it. Not whatever he sending , I have been wrong and I believe I will continue to do so in the future but I will take the L when it is actually an L.
Not three paragraph without a single mention of the vehicle mentioned in the thread name or the vehicle in the convo.
It’s not that you won’t read it, it’s that you genuinely can’t.
Look I would reply to you with something proper but look at how you’ve interacted with him and others about it .,shows how genuinely childish you are.
You cannot read small sentences or short paragraphs then why are you on a forum for discussing
or do you only want to discuss what you want to hear?
who* not whom here.
He plays more than britain dudes 4th most used vehicle is a T72AV turms brother.
Cause he can’t lol. im an English teacher mate and the “im not reading all that” comes from a lack of reading comprehension.
3 Likes
That is not part of a bible at all.
You need to learn to read more if you think a mere 2 or 3 sentences is a lot
1 Like