You clearly not , don’t elaborate. I would have not called out the guy if he didn’t state that he play multiple nation (which he clearly doesn’t) and keep spilling the most ignorance take on vehicle or topic he clearly does not understand.
And bro jumped in to offer no take on the actual topic and start stats shaming me. Like bro clam up, Im a premium player, nothing you say about my stats are important but if you actually worse than me ? Maybe should consider retire cause bro worse than a wallet warrior.
I don’t have anything against bad player. But maybe you should go to some other thread about US or USSR and defend them there. Don’t have to pick on me to assert something. I know your history on here.
Never , i’m guessing with the BMPT premium they gonna stay for at least 6 more months lmao. Gotta get them sale up before nerfing it , can’t wait for the amount of thread that call out Gaijin cause they nerf it
Now that’s a good comparison.
Cause while Puma has APFSDS, it doesn’t have missiles.
And while it’s vastly more mobile, it’s not as armored.
Like, I think 10.3 Puma’s worse than BMPT.
@アルクェイド_ブリュンスタッド
It’s one of those situations that its offensive armament is sub-par for the BR, its mobility is average, but its armor is you know… T-72B, I think the best armor at that BR still, if not 2nd best.
It’s weird.
I think the armor matters, but that hasn’t typically been the opinion of others; Mobility was usually the argument.
So I think it’s just a weird moment. New vehicle makeup causing a hard guess of where it should be.
But still more than enough to at a bear minimum disable any MBT if not out right kill any MBT fairly easily and what its gun cannot, its ATGMs can.
Given we have far far weaker IFVs at and around the same BR, calling the BMPT “sub-par” in firepower is just being disingenuous
It has the survivability of an MBT, T-series tanks have decent mobility at that BR (sure their reverse speed sucks, but press W = Nuke) and it has a powerful gun and ATGMs. It puts MBTs to shame, let alone any other IFV at that BR, not all of which can match the BMPT in any of those 3 categories, let alone more than 1.
The best we can hope right now is the reduction of sale in the 2S38.
If we want to fix bigger issue , the reduction of sale in all premium across the board.
As of now everytime it sale. 2S38 always dominate the sale chart. Why would they nerf their people claimed to be “cashcow” when the very same people also have the thing in their account ?
For example take British vehicle. Im grinding it , and frankly from the look of all the Chally only one actually worth crewing. The rest are dogshit garbo , their premium reflect that very well. Non of the top of the line Chally deserve to sit in the same br bracket as T90M/8BVM/2A7/SEPV2.
Non of them should be there. But they know that people will ignore these issue , simply major nation still getting good addition in tech tree and especially in premium. Why would they care about Italian Arriete , Japanese Type10/TKX or British Challies when they know. That their playerbase will buy that 70-80 dollar premium at full price(even at half price it still extremely overprice). But sale still up just drop some random dogshit every major for those nation and everyone will be half happy
The missiles are the best ones at their respective BR and the guns while missing APFSDS have more than double the fire rate of a bushmaster or an MK30. Am i missing something on why they would be subpar for 10.3?