This is all-time
where tf are you pulling your numbers from
Whatever makes your nights less scary lad. Hopefully the fact you didn’t win an internet argument won’t give you nightmares for the next two months. In any case, the fact you couldn’t actually present an actual counter-argument, and had to resort to a pretty blatant strawman, should be enough of a sign for others that any discussion with you will just lead them in circles 'cause you’ve never and never will be interested in anything close to balance, but more’so in wanting certain nation/its vehicles to outperform their peers. I hope they will take this as a warning they’re talking to an extremely biased individual, with very limited understanding of what he’s talking about, as he has no experience against or in said vehicles, and will make use of imaginary data point, rather than simply accepting he’s wrong.
:)
So yeah, just as I wrote it.
That’s just your opinion.
Nothing comes close to therapy.
I think your free trial of ChatGPT ended considering you’re just repeating yourself now.
1 Like
but a single stat from march its good enough then? you know damn well how is it with vehicles, when they are new people who want to try the new shining vehicle everyone including the bast majority of the community that have no skillset want to try it and it happens with almost any new vehicle, it happened with the T90M when it came out, it happened to the 2A7V it happened to the 2S38 the most and even the centauro 2 is suffering from the exact same problem. Your entire rebuttal hinges on one statistic from March already a massive sample diluted across thousands of matches but the bigger issue is that it’s pulled from a premium vehicle. Premiums are well documented skill sinks Gaijin knows they attract inexperienced players who drag performance stats down. If you actually look at the tech tree BMPT, the ‘real’ player base is posting one of the highest K/D ratios in War Thunder right now. And here’s the kicker: I’m using that same March dataset you are.
Nah, you tried to “prove” that BMPT is dominant by saying it moved up in BR, from which you still haven’t progressed further as you’re trying your best to ignore my perfectly valid question.
I’ve played plenty of games against BMPTs.
Much, much better than all time stats when it comes to figuring out if it’s indeed broken at 11.3.
Dude, haven’t you seen my reply to you about this same exact thing ?
You forgot to reply so I’ll assume that’s exactly what happened.
Very balanced nation Russia is a top tier grb
Every games are won, score games are like 60-10 / 60-20 in favor of Russia
Dude rushes MBTs close range as if it was nothing at all
Very entertaining to play this game at top tier when you’re not Russia. They buried this game for good
Another example of its broken side armour to add to the collection
This shot did not stop him in the match, infact I dont think it did anything at all
1 Like
Stop playing it then if you hate it so much
That is valid true, but 80UM2 is also an event vehicle so arguably also an outlier, granted march stats will still be using its 11.3 figures so wouldnt really know till “april/may” get loaded to see what impact it actually has.
But we can actually somewhat deduce the impact the 11.7 BR will actually have if we compare all time stats vs month to month stats, they only deviate by about 4-5% so to somehow expect 2x that deviation from an 11.3 to 11.7 BR move would be highly unlikely, if we assume a 5% deviation like we see in prior months vs all time stats then at best its W/R should drop to around 54-55%
But as it goes up on BR this also has the effect of pushing new players off it and forcing higher skilled players (if you wanna call them that when playing this) back to pushing its stats up or keeping the stats where they are. Granted its speculation on my part here but for a vehicle this strong, I can bet 5K GE it wont drop that low
BMPT 11.7 → 10.0
SWaTrgInf 10.7 → 12.0
Zusammenfassung
/s
Too op send it to 13.7/s
I still vote for……Thanos snap
Outlier of what ?
BMPTs at 11.7 will now have a significantly harder time getting into 10.7 games and even when you get into one, only four players will be able to spawn a BMPT at the very best, all the while competing for those “spots” with other decently popular 11.7 vehicles like Fuji, Al-Khalid and others.
On the other hand, BMPTs will now be able to see 12.7 which is yet another popular BR filled with vehicles that have a much easier time going against them. If they keep their numbers up in regards of games played, there’s a high chance BMPT spammers will keep getting placed in 12.7 games due to the chronic lack of 11.0 lineups.
Read above.
It would be fair to assume linear drop of WR with BR change if all nations had similar lineups and vehicles across the board, which they don’t. We have holes in tech trees that might result in some BRs being prone to uptiers/downtiers more frequently, deviating from that linear line of yours.
Not to mention that WR between 11.0 and 11.7 is naturally somewhat influenced by the sheer amount of vehicles available for the USSR in comparison to it’s two major rivals, Germany and US.
US has two MBTs and one AA, while Germany has one IFV and one AA.
Meanwhile USSR has 8 vehicles, rivaled only by China and Italy.
1 Like
All that poop must be penetrating his object 279
I understand what he was trying to get across but still, it was a rather wierd analogy for CAS.
I would have said that CAS is more like some guy being able to smite your character from the kill screen in an FPS.
It’s the life of a typical Object 279, MAUS, or IS7 players seeing a BR 7 4k lb bomb sending them back to the hanger from not achieving a nuke. Everyone hates CAS until it’s time to drop their nukes myself included.
1 Like
N4T0 reload faster but forget to say other sentence ACE CREW
Sure, but some people also uptiered it to 12.7 regardless
A shame starshark doesn’t show the average Br the vehicle is actually played at i guess
In terms of performances there’s no denying it belongs at least to 12.0+.
Sure firepower wouldn’t be that great up there, but the annoying and not accurate survivability could still be useful to hold a flank.
And that’s how a balanced vehicle should look : strong aspects held back by weaker aspects, in case you forgot the basics…
1 Like