Like the vast majority of this forum? And hundreds of people who have voiced their opinion against the BMPT in this thread alone? Sorry dude, but you’re not that guy. Being a contrarian when objective facts are presented isn’t a sign of intelligence.
10 Likes
you realise you can define a date period and while W/R is lower so is every other vehicle, it still sits #2/#3 in W/R alone in the month of March.
I only gave the overall W/R so yes that does include prior BRs.
But if look at March only its still 59/60% for both but its still 7-8% higher than the 4th highest W/R vehicle (T80UM2) which is the event vehicle.
Feb is the same story, lower W/R vs March (so actually March saw its W/R increase which also the same month it got its prior BR increase) but its still #2/#3 in W/R in the 11.7 BR bracket.
If I dont go based on BR its not #2 or #3 in rank but then thats also including 3.3 BR vehicles etc. so its best to compare BR for BR realistically.
If we simply look at W/R for March its still #18 and #22, with every other vehicle above it being sub BR 11.7 vehicle and a good majority of the vehicles above it are event vehicles, so take what you want from that tbh.
2 Likes
doesnt it just make you filled with so much happiness and whimsy that gaijin just completely ignored the suggestions to push MKK and MK2 to 13.7 because muh stats. Even tho its effectively 27SM at lower BR.
Same way they ignored TT BMPT to go to 12.0 given its literally a massive improvement to the premium BMPT.
I love gaijin balancing team almost as much as whichever team is responsible for modelling maps.
1 Like
Also very possible you just got lucky here, Ive chucked L15A2 as well as M107 at the BMPT and its unreliable as hell.
Sometimes it oneshots it and other times it does nothing, I tend to aim where you shot it when im running SPHs for fun.
and like, compare this to anything else thats similar at 11.7. My squaddie at the time didnt have APDS otherwise we would have probably both survived.
The APDS despite what some creatures here say is more than capable of destroying external modules or penning through weakspots on many tanks, coupled with ridiculous survivability (5 crewmembers is just stupid!), if you dont oneshot it via LFP or seriously cripple it with your first shot, youre basically cooked.
I don’t want to answer this one because I don’t have anything to reply with.
Hmmm, lets call it a strawman in hopes it goes away.
So yeah, just as I wrote it.
Nothing comes close to therapy.
Can’t really see all those people begging Gaijin to place BMPTs at 12.7.
It needing to be at 12.7 isn’t backed up by any objective facts.
When it is I might change my mind.
Maybe when 99% of the forum disagrees with you, the problem isn’t them, it’s you. A little self reflection goes a long way.
2 Likes
BMPTs got that WR at 11.3.
80UM2 got it at 11.7.
Found plenty of people that don’t think BMPT needs to be at 12.7, but those people usually don’t have a hate boner towards certain stuff so it’s understandable.
We don’t even know how they’ll perform at 11.7 but forum know-it-alls just know, as a fact, it’s still a full BR lower than it should be.
1 Like
Wiiiild thing to say
At least HE works now but thats still doesnt excuse Gaijin from not remodeling the BMPT properly,thats all we ask lmfao
People argues that “Its based on a T series tank so ofc it has to be tanky” and yet the T serie DO NOT TANK that much at all
That vehicle had 1.27 K/D while being at 11.3 and it moved up to 11.7 recently.
Doesn’t really scream broken to me.
If it wasnt broken then people wouldnt be complaining that much isnt that right?
There were and still are forums full of just complains about how randomly the BMPT acts in terms of model
And btw,not sure what site you checked but i last see 1.98 KD
At this point it’s clear you’re not engaging with the argument in good faith. You’ve been presented with capability breakdowns, comparative stats spanning millions of games, and direct in-game BR precedents and every single time the response has been either “cherrypicked” or “doesn’t count” without any actual methodological rebuttal.
You don’t own either BMPT. By your own stats you barely play the game, and when you do you’re not playing against it regularly or using it yourself. That’s not a foundation for dismissing first hand experience and hard data from people who actually have both.
Calling everyone who disagrees “biased” or telling them to “cope” isn’t a counterargument. Multiple forum members have made the same points independently at some point the pattern stops being a coincidence and starts being a conclusion.
The evidence for the BMPT-72 outperforming its BR has been laid out clearly. Disagreeing with it is fine, but you need an actual argument to do that. “I don’t think so” dressed up in condescension isn’t one.
6 Likes
I’m talking strictly about premium one here as you quoted the guy discussing it.
If it was so hard to damage and kill consistently it’d have better stats than it has currently.
Where ?
I dont know bro,even the 72 has 1.81 KD of the site im looking at
My argument tho which as ALWAYS people fail to understand is that,im trying to say that Gaijin should probably simply remodel the vehicle if people complain too much and it was proven that it doesnt act properly and i cannot believe it takes months to do so either way
Thunderskill…if you have better one say it (Im actually serious and not sarcastic)
Of course it doesn’t count when you took stats from back when it was 10.3, not 11.3 lol.
Did you seriously thought I’d just accept global all time stats as evidence of it’s overperformance at 11.3 ?
Yes, it having 1.27 K/D is a clear sign of overperformance.
No wonder you had to look at all time stats to spice up those numbers a bit.
I absolutely despise what they did with the flankers
1 Like
march’s stats
based on this all the BMPT really needs is an ammo rack nerf. Maybe weaker electronics
Then it’s fine
I’m amazed you still haven’t heard about Statshark in mid 2026.